Originally posted by glenn mcrory
View Post
You, on the other hand, were getting all emotional and **** at me just for insinuating the thought that Lomachenko can... possibly....somehow...against all odds..pull victory out of his ass against Mikey. And you were like "How you dare to even think that?". I remember that dialogue so who's the fanboy here?
Originally posted by glenn mcrory
View Post
You get the credit for being consistent fighter. Dominating a division for a long time is a sign of consistency, meaning you're the man at that weight. Mikey never had any weight on lock. Crawford was the man at that weight and Mikey was switching divisions, picking on averages
Second, you get the credit for being an undisputed champion, which is a historical accomplishment, and it's related to the previous point - that's a sign of a consistent fighter who's dominating his division
So Crawford had the bum division on lock, like you say, but Mickey was jumping weightclasses more which assumes he had more options, and better variety of possible matchups, than the fighter who stayed in one division for a long time, but his resume is still on par, how that can be?
By the way, Mikey occupied that bum division as soon as Crawford cleaned it and left it
Originally posted by glenn mcrory
View Post
Originally posted by glenn mcrory
View Post
What Crawford got to do with Mikey resume anyway? Even if you think his wins are bum fighters, okay you have your own opinion but he keeps it real and not screaming about fighting and moving up for Charlo or Canelo and then ends up fighting Viktor Postol or Felix Diaz instead of what he was promising, ha ha. You get it twisted, I'm making fun not of his resume, but of expectations and promises compared to the actual things coming from Mikey so that whole argument from you was pointless
Comment