It's not useful to conflate race and religion (what you did in your post).
Criticism of islam perfectly just but you lose credibility when race is injected into the discussion.
At what point did i mention race in my post?
I simply (facetiously admittedly) asked what religion he was from. My question was based on the nature/method of the attack carried out as it was similar to the ones used in France. I NEVER once mentioned race.
The racial aspect of it was your assumption, which makes you the one that linked race to religion, not me. So don't point the finger at me for linking such things, as i'd never be that ignorant.
And for the record, the man in the photo looks black to me, not asian/middle eastern, so i'm not going naturally assume a black man is a muslim. As i said, my post was based on the nature of the attack, not the mans skin colour.
You can be sure they already verified he is a muslim, otherwise they would not go anywhere near the word 'terror'. The word terror has changed in definition to 'terror by muslims' over time.
I bet none of the perfectly peaceful members of other religions would become radicalized either if their countries were being drone striked regularly.
Comment