Originally posted by HeroBando
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Hopkins: Jacobs Will Beat Golovkin - A Big Upset is Coming!
Collapse
-
Originally posted by LoadedWraps View Post
What part of the record is fake? Last I checked those were all legit wins with no controversy.
Don't worry, i'll wait.
legit wins don't break Hopkins record, legit title defences do
the WBA interim title ?
that fake " title " only exists because of greed/corruption
The WBA have promised to phase out those fake titles in favor of having one champion..... so, IF Golovkin beats Jacobs - and he likely will - the WBA interim title will cease to exist.....
..... meaning that when Golovkin " breaks " Hopkins record..... he will have done so by defending a title that no longer exists..... which is yea, fkn lame
the WBA promised to phase out those fake titles for a reason, so why support that rubbish by recognizing them now?
diminishing the standards within boxing is disrespectful both to the sport and to the fighters, past and present
Comment
-
Originally posted by Reloaded View PostIts not size its skillset, Ward is not Wade I believe Andre beats him at any weight they can both make.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postlegit wins don't break Hopkins record, legit title defences do
the WBA interim title ?
that fake " title " only exists because of greed/corruption
The WBA have promised to phase out those fake titles in favor of having one champion..... so, IF Golovkin beats Jacobs - and he likely will - the WBA interim title will cease to exist.....
..... meaning that when Golovkin " breaks " Hopkins record..... he will have done so by defending a title that no longer exists..... which is yea, fkn lame
the WBA promised to phase out those fake titles for a reason, so why support that rubbish by recognizing them now?
diminishing the standards within boxing is disrespectful both to the sport and to the fighters, past and present
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postlegit wins don't break Hopkins record, legit title defences do
the WBA interim title ?
that fake " title " only exists because of greed/corruption
The WBA have promised to phase out those fake titles in favor of having one champion..... so, IF Golovkin beats Jacobs - and he likely will - the WBA interim title will cease to exist.....
..... meaning that when Golovkin " breaks " Hopkins record..... he will have done so by defending a title that no longer exists..... which is yea, fkn lame
the WBA promised to phase out those fake titles for a reason, so why support that rubbish by recognizing them now?
diminishing the standards within boxing is disrespectful both to the sport and to the fighters, past and present
Comment
-
Originally posted by robbyheartbaby View Postthe interim belt isn't counted as one of his title defenses you need to get your facts straight son. And don't start on the level of opposition look at some of the bums Hopkins feasted on.
" interim "..... " regular "... same thing
he wasn't the REAL champ
how is it possible for the WBA to have 3 " champions " ?
how is it possible for 3 WBA " champions " to rack up title "defences" simultaneously?
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeadShots View Postthe same people arguing that GGG's title wasn't around during Bernard's reign.
well Bernard defended his IBF title which was only around since 1983 lmao. so Monzon, Robinson, Hagler..... none of them saw the IBF title.
So Hopkins record don't count?
I mean at least be consistent with your narrative. just LMAO
nope
people arguing the WBA cannot have 3 " champions " simultaneously
how is it possible for 3 WBA " champions " to make legitimate defences simultaneously?
if your wife had kids to 2 other guys, would you consider them yours?
would you consider them legitimate?
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post" interim "..... " regular "... same thing
he wasn't the REAL champ
how is it possible for the WBA to have 3 " champions " ?
how is it possible for 3 WBA " champions " to rack up title "defences" simultaneously?
Comment
Comment