Supreme Court rules in favor of cake baker who refused to bake cake for gay couple

[Rip Chudd]

Good. Still hope in this world.

[BrometheusBob.]

Bad decision that sets a worse precedent.

You'd think by now we'd have an understanding that you can't turn down people simply for who they are, so I'm worried less about the cakes which I don't care much about and more about what ''rights'' businesses will be offered in the future.

[BrometheusBob.]

So they said it was their religious right because their religion outlaws ****sexuality?

Couldn't this pave the way for Mormon fundamentalists to be able to marry and fck teenage girls because of religious freedom?

This is part of the issue with the never ending crusade to expand "religious freedom". Just about anything can fall into the umbrella of religious freedom because you can connect anything you personally believe to your religion. In the 50s and 60s, plenty of people argued that their religious freedoms would be infringed upon if they were made to provide service to Black people, and they wholeheartedly held that belief. That they believe their religion tells them to do it should not be automatiic justification for it.

[Thraxox]

Bad decision that sets a worse precedent.

You'd think by now we'd have an understanding that you can't turn down people simply for who they are, so I'm worried less about the cakes which I don't care much about and more about what ''rights'' businesses will be offered in the future.

business has the right to refuse services. If they don't want to serve you, so be it. There are hundred of bakers in a state.

This ruling signified the purest form of democracy where people are allowed to uphold their decision without the fear of being lead into court because of a tyrannical justice system.

[Thraxox]

Justice is served.

[siablo14]

business has the right to refuse services. If they don't want to serve you, so be it. There are hundred of bakers in a state.

This ruling signified the purest form of democracy where people are allowed to uphold their decision without the fear of being lead into court because of a tyrannical justice system.

Not when it comes to race though.

[DoubleLeftH00k]

This is part of the issue with the never ending crusade to expand "religious freedom". Just about anything can fall into the umbrella of religious freedom because you can connect anything you personally believe to your religion. In the 50s and 60s, plenty of people argued that their religious freedoms would be infringed upon if they were made to provide service to Black people, and they wholeheartedly held that belief. That they believe their religion tells them to do it should not be automatiic justification for it.

then that falls to racism
Court will not have a 7-2 ruling in favor of that kind of church I guarantee u that

Ur over thinking such thing
The reason why 7 judges was in favor of the business owner is because if they didn't then all business owners will have their rights taken away to refuse service to anyone

[Thraxox]

Not when it comes to race though.

This is not about race. This is religious freedoms challenged by the tyrannical left.

Any white man that refuses to serve a black man should have his license revokedm

[DoubleLeftH00k]

This is not about race. This is religious freedoms challenged by the tyrannical left.

Any white man that refuses to serve a black man should have his license revokedm

Liberals think religion and race is the same thing

Not surpriced they stoopid

[siablo14]

This is not about race. This is religious freedoms challenged by the tyrannical left.

Any white man that refuses to serve a black man should have his license revokedm

Yeah man...