Originally posted by KayDub
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How can you watch this and tell me Bradley was dominated?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by ELPacman View PostI think it's so funny how many people analyze this fight to death with edited videos and whatnot when it doesn't really require any of that. For people who aren't blind and saw the fight whether you were drunk or not, I think it was clear that Pac did more than enough to win the fight. If your Bradley and you need to prove to the world that you deserve the win and really want it, you don't go out there pity pat and throw 1s and 2s once in awhile. You go out there and act like you want it. Take serious control and attack. You aren't going to win decisions against an aggressive attacker like Pacquiao if you aren't willing to take some punches in return. So many fighters become gunshy against Pac.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MJ223 View PostIts an edited video Larry.....
If he had boxed on the backfoot from the start the fight could have been much closer and Pacquiao didn't look comfortable as the hunter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dominicano Soy View PostIt's not that difficult of a fight to score, but when I see posters say Manny won 9-3/ 8-4 they do lose credibility because there are 5 rounds that one can not possibly give to Manny, 1,2,10,11,12. Round 7 is a round all 3 judges gave to Bradley I believe, to me that was a close but clear round to Bradley but not one I would heavily argue in favor of because of how close it was. It's become useless debating the result of this fight, it was close, could have gone either way and Manny simply did not get the decision.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dominicano Soy View PostIt's not that difficult of a fight to score, but when I see posters say Manny won 9-3/ 8-4 they do lose credibility because there are 5 rounds that one can not possibly give to Manny, 1,2,10,11,12. Round 7 is a round all 3 judges gave to Bradley I believe, to me that was a close but clear round to Bradley but not one I would heavily argue in favor of because of how close it was. It's become useless debating the result of this fight, it was close, could have gone either way and Manny simply did not get the decision.
Comment
-
Originally posted by viperz007 View Posttaking away mannys landed punches throughout the fight is a perfect formula for making the fight look like bradley dominated :/
the only significant punch i can remember bradley landed on manny was a jab
me saying bradley won the fight is idiotic
now u get the point of how u look like...
Comment
-
Originally posted by JDezi4 View PostThis is the stuff that makes me upset... People that complain about how Bradley ran, Bradley didn't "take it to" Pac, yada yada yada... It shows so much ignorance...
Bradley is a slick boxer... Just becuz he can come forward, just becuz he can be the aggressor, does not mean he's a Brandon Rios brawler... And anyone that expected him to move forward against Pac? A slick boxer walking toward a power puncher?
Please do some researchOriginally posted by KayDub View PostBradley is so far from being a "slick" boxer that it isn't even funny.
When I think of Bradley I think of a wild fighter that throws a lot of hooks and headbutts.
Bradley pretty much ALWAYS comes forward and jumps on guys. He's a rough fighter if anything.
Comment
-
Originally posted by valero View PostFor those of you saying Bradley won..
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/vi...adley-compubox
Pacquiao landed 253
Bradley 159
Those would have to be some rib-cracking, face-bruising, monster punches Bradley was landing to be more valuable than Pacquiao's.
No knockdowns? No marks on Pacquiao's face? That's a failure.
Comment
Comment