Originally posted by dibzvincent143
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Saunders Sees Wilder-Fury Unfolding Similar To Fury-Pianeta
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Posthe always been gun shy. Have you not followed his career. Most of his kos came against smaller men after he threw 59 jabs and eventually let the right hand go. He's not as effective vs people with the same or a similar size/reach as him.
That version of Wlad still beats Wilder imo
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Posthe always been gun shy. Have you not followed his career. Most of his kos came against smaller men after he threw 59 jabs and eventually let the right hand go. He's not as effective vs people with the same or a similar size/reach as him.
After two years he was then able to make Joshua go thru life and death
Comment
-
Originally posted by dibzvincent143 View PostHe has low output but always finds a way to win. Against Fury he wasn’t able to do so. I’m not gonna use Wlad’s technique as an excuse why he lost, I’m going to give fury his credit. He fought effectively.
After two years he was then able to make Joshua go thru life and death
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Postsure fury deserves credit but if a fighter chooses not to take chances or become more aggressive when he notices that his typical boxing style isn't working, that's on him.
Don’t you think Fury’s movements and tactics made it difficult for wlad to find a way to win that night?
He was disrupting his rhythm all night. And making him pay at times that he commits. That’s why he was gunshy, or even more so than usual.
He was outboxed.
I don’t get the “Fury won, well that’s because Wlad was gunshy” kind of reasoning
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by dibzvincent143 View PostSo he lost clearly right??? Wth are we even discussing.
Don’t you think Fury’s movements and tactics made it difficult for wlad to find a way to win that night?
He was disrupting his rhythm all night. And making him pay at times that he commits. That’s why he was gunshy, or even more so than usual.
He was outboxed.
I don’t get the “Fury won, well that’s because Wlad was gunshy” kind of reasoning
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Postthe debate was, you believe that the version of klitchko that fought fury would beat wilder and I don't agree. Klitchko is historically passive, had just went a full 12 rounds with Bryant Jennings, barely threw punches vs fury. I think Wilders jab and power punching would've kept klitchko passive, especially the nearr 40 yr old version of him who was clearly slowing down.
Klitchko doesn’t overextend himself and leaves himself unbalance and that’ll make it difficult for Wilder to land his money punch.
Styles make fights. Fury beats Wlad because of movement and speed. Wlad beats wilder because of great fundamentals, defense, patience and right amount of power to keep you honest.
Even Wlad and Josh could’ve still gone either way!
But okayyy agree to disagree.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dibzvincent143 View PostAnd how did he manage to pull the trigger 2 years later and almost KOed Joshua?? Hmmm
Suddenly its magic?
Comment
Comment