Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
View Post
That "worth what someone is willing to pay" supercedes all that ratio crap being spotted in these threads. It supercedes everything.
Now, against that back drop, Hearn was "willing to pay" Parker roughly 30%. Thats what we agree was his or "the fight's" worth. Now, is the boxing public to believe that Wilder, who draws more fans than Parker, has the final belt and gateway to undisputed, is WORTH less than Parker?
Comment