Originally posted by lolpz
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pulev vs Dinu Averages 469,000 Viewers
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by lolpz View PostI wouldn't say the fighters themselves are the problems...It's the match ups.
Pulev-Dinu? Gvozdyk-Ngumu? Ngumu is arguably worse than any fighter Stevenson had ever defended his belt against. (And we both know how much ***** they gave him for those defenses)
These guys are not the kind of fighters that should be headling cards against opposition like that. Only fighters like Lomachenko can get away with it and still do decent numbers. If Arum really wants to build these guys into stars, he's gotta match them up much tougher. These two cards with these two fights headlining as main events back to back is literally a waste of money and horrible for the sport. Put it on an undercard at the very least.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lolpz View PostI wouldn't say the fighters themselves are the problems...It's the match ups.
Pulev-Dinu? Gvozdyk-Ngumu? Ngumu is arguably worse than any fighter Stevenson had ever defended his belt against. (And we both know how much ***** they gave him for those defenses)
These guys are not the kind of fighters that should be headling cards against opposition like that. Only fighters like Lomachenko can get away with it and still do decent numbers. If Arum really wants to build these guys into stars, he's gotta match them up much tougher. These two cards with these two fights headlining as main events back to back is literally a waste of money and horrible for the sport. Put it on an undercard at the very least.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post95% of people take a "soft touch" as their first title defense. Don't throw shade at Nail for doing what everyone else does.
I don't have a problem with the fight, I understand. But why is it headling a card on ESPN? It's not a headline period. He's not the attraction to get away with that. If that's the headline imagine the undercard?
If he's going to headline a card on ESPN, it better be against a decent opponent.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DaBeastO View Postmaaan if you don't get out with that nonsense. chickenson spent years fighting trash opposition this gvzodyk's first fight since he turned chickenson into a vegetable. ESPN have dates they need to fill out more boxing the better at least it's not 75 ppv like that mikey vs spence debacle.
At least Stevenson was a legit draw. People can say what they say, he was popular and he knocked people out. Plus his resume wasn't that bad, he beat some decent fighters. Gvozdyk's best win is a fight he was arguably losing against a 41 year old Stevenson before he gassed in round 11 and got caught. He doesn't have the same luxury.
Gvozdyk isn't at the status yet he needs to build to that. No reason for him to be headlining a card against an opponent like this. If this was an undercard fight somewhere no problem.
Comment
-
Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post95% of people take a "soft touch" as their first title defense. Don't throw shade at Nail for doing what everyone else does.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lolpz View PostSee, you didn't thoroughly grasp my post.
I don't have a problem with the fight, I understand. But why is it headling a card on ESPN? It's not a headline period. He's not the attraction to get away with that. If that's the headline imagine the undercard?
If he's going to headline a card on ESPN, it better be against a decent opponent.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DaBeastO View Postgvozdyk just destroyed chickenson he's now the wbc and lineal champion at light heavyweight he's the man in his division a division with a lot of history and prestige he's no longer an undercard fighter.
Gvozdyk vs. Jack would be a great competitive fight though if you ask me
Comment
-
Comment