they most certainly were.... I had Ortiz up but knew what would eventually happen when he got tired....
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
They were going to ROB Ortiz
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by DramaShow View PostBeen telling people this for a while, the US is.probably the most corrupt place for boxing now. Always makes me laugh when the yanks start saying about UK hometown decisions , some of the ones they've churned out over the years have been atrocious and they are getting worse.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rip Chudd View PostHe was 1 round up on all scorecards. The truth of the matter is we don't know what was going to happen. Let's not act like the first 4 or so rounds were all Ortiz. He was dictating the pace but neither was landing anything really outside of jabs. Judges split those rounds up if i'm not mistaken. I had Ortiz up though myself
Comment
-
Originally posted by billeau2 View PostI see your point.
You are the rule hound so I trust your understanding. My understanding is that regardless of whether a fighter slips, tangles, flies by an act of God... If a punch touches a fighter and the fighter falls the punch caused the knockdown. In that sequence it is obvious Ortiz got hit with a jab, so... a ref would have to assume the punch caused the knockdown.
Is that correct? or does the ref have the discetion to say the punch even though it landed clean and the fighter fell, was caused by a slip? Either way that punch IMO caused the fall. But I don't know if one could call that a 10-8 round.
Thoughts?
Comment
-
Originally posted by kilojay505 View Postand who do you think haymonwanted to win between his "two" fighters........... exactly wilder so dont try to split hairs and look smart because you just end up looking stupid and shows you dksab
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by soul_survivor View PostAs they should. Even the 8th was close to a 10-8 but i gave it 10-9 because Wilder recovered his legs and fought back...a little.
Comment
Comment