An interesting question, would like to hear some differing opinions on this.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who has the better resume, Luis Ortiz or Dillian Whyte?
Collapse
-
Both their resumes are pretty thin.
Ortiz beat a shot Thompson, Scott who only showed up to not get KO'ed and Jennings who's best result is a loss to Wlad.
Whyte beat Browne who was arguably shot based off of his performance, Chisora who he went life and death with and Helenius who was just as shot as Thompson.
I honestly couldn't say who has a better resume, neither has an outstanding win. But if they ever fought I'd favour Ortiz slightly due to his better technique and power.
Comment
-
Originally posted by yammy25 View PostThompson is a nothing..not even b level. Chisora knocked out Malik scott.
Whytes resume is better.. Ortiz is a better boxer and beats Whyte
Jennings gave Wlad a tougher fight than Haye, Povetkin, Thompson, Ibragimov etc. Ortiz toyed with a man Wlad struggled with.
Comment
-
Seems like about a tie to me. Both has some decent wins. Both got KOed in their title shots after hurting the champion. There isn't much difference to chose between them. They are both legit number 5 or 6 contenders but not the best. Whyte is younger and will probably be around longer. Whyte could become a champion soon but Parker will probably beat him.
Comment
-
Whyte has the slightly better resume but head to head Ortiz would win.
Whyte Top 5 wins: Chisora, Browne, Helenius, Allen, Lewison
Ortiz Top 5 Wins: Jennings, Scott, Thompson, Allen, Barrett?
Comment
Comment