Originally posted by Eff Pandas
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What to make of Spences win?
Collapse
-
spence beat brook who everyone knew he could not make 147 anymore
pre brook he fought ..no one
since he beat brook he has fought ..
the true facts are spence is getting more responce on here & social networks but the problem is its not from fighting quality foes..its the opposite .
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by TJ highway View Post
I knew Ocampo had no chance in hell but C'mon!Last edited by daggum; 06-19-2018, 02:35 AM.
Comment
-
All Spence's win means is that he isn't a scared lil schoolgirl like g. He had to fight Ocampo and he did.
Spence's fights against Brook proved a lot. His win against Peterson, proved it wasn't a fluke. His win against Ocampo simply proved he can ko Mr. Ocampo in one round. That's what it proved. That's what it means.
Spence is my favorite active fighter, but it pissed me off big time that he didn't fight Ocampo until six months after beating Peterson. I mean, damn, Errol barely broke a sweat against Peterson, he coulda fought Ocampo a week later. The Haymon haters are usually rather ridiculous with blatant double standards, but the one truth they mention is Haymon fighters are not nearly as active as they should be. I get it, it is boxing and one punch could end a fight at anytime. The top guys don't want to risk a Buster Douglas moment. But the only way Tyson got the rep he did and the popularity he did, was by ko'ing someone every single month of the year. And until Garcia, Porter, Thurman, or Bud steps up to the plate Spence should be doing the same thing.
The IBF doesn't have any dangerous ww ranked. Spence should literally try to beat all top 15 IBF welterweights in one calendar year. I would bet a good amount of money he could do it. And he would probably ko all of them too. His fight against Ocampo was like one round of sparring. He could, and should, ko Ugas within the month.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr.Cool View PostAll Spence's win means is that he isn't a scared lil schoolgirl like g. He had to fight Ocampo and he did.
Spence's fights against Brook proved a lot. His win against Peterson, proved it wasn't a fluke. His win against Ocampo simply proved he can ko Mr. Ocampo in one round. That's what it proved. That's what it means.
Spence is my favorite active fighter, but it pissed me off big time that he didn't fight Ocampo until six months after beating Peterson. I mean, damn, Errol barely broke a sweat against Peterson, he coulda fought Ocampo a week later. The Haymon haters are usually rather ridiculous with blatant double standards, but the one truth they mention is Haymon fighters are not nearly as active as they should be. I get it, it is boxing and one punch could end a fight at anytime. The top guys don't want to risk a Buster Douglas moment. But the only way Tyson got the rep he did and the popularity he did, was by ko'ing someone every single month of the year. And until Garcia, Porter, Thurman, or Bud steps up to the plate Spence should be doing the same thing.
The IBF doesn't have any dangerous ww ranked. Spence should literally try to beat all top 15 IBF welterweights in one calendar year. I would bet a good amount of money he could do it. And he would probably ko all of them too. His fight against Ocampo was like one round of sparring. He could, and should, ko Ugas within the month.
But a lot of people in the UK see it differently! I'm just saying!
Last edited by TJ highway; 06-19-2018, 05:15 AM.
Comment
-
Comment