Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GGG: Margarito & ODLH had problems with smaller guy (Pacquiao)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GGG: Margarito & ODLH had problems with smaller guy (Pacquiao)

    Asked his thoughts on Kell Brook having to move up to fight him he responds by saying history has shown smaller guys will give bigger guys problems. Like Pacquiao vs De La Hoya and Pacquiao vs. Margarito

    https://youtu.be/b9N7ZtBDGm0?t=4m29s


  • #2
    But it's not honorable for boxing, right GGG?

    Comment


    • #3
      "This not respect to boxing...jusss...juno..Abel tell me what say...jusss"

      Comment


      • #4
        GGG about the Canelo-Khan match:

        ¨mismatch, canelo is businezzman, no idol of boxing!¨

        GGG about the GGG-Brook match:

        ¨smaller guys will give bigger guys problem y'know¨

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
          "This not respect to boxing...jusss...juno..Abel tell me what say...jusss"

          Lmao........

          Comment


          • #6
            What a ****ing clown

            He got jokes.

            Comment


            • #7
              De La Hoya was weight drained to hell, and Margarito came down from the limit, and most importantly, didn't have his plaster!

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
                Asked his thoughts on Kell Brook having to move up to fight him he responds by saying history has shown smaller guys will give bigger guys problems. Like Pacquiao vs De La Hoya and Pacquiao vs. Margarito

                https://youtu.be/b9N7ZtBDGm0?t=4m29s

                they also met the smaller guy at a reasonable catchweight...well at least margo did....DLH was drained but still gave the little go some leeway

                GGG never has to concede anything

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
                  they also met the smaller guy at a reasonable catchweight...well at least margo did....DLH was drained but still gave the little go some leeway

                  GGG never has to concede anything
                  Not always. Oscar was massive compared to Gatti. I don't remember if it was a CW or not though. And Oscar predictably beat his ass.

                  Golovkin is selling the fight, of course he's not going to say Kell is smaller it's a massive mismatch its a joke of a fight don't watch it, so he's coming off as a hypocrite when you compare it to his remarks about Canelo Khan. And he's received a lot of criticism for it and rightfully so.

                  We already know Golovkin didn't want this fight, he said so months ago and he said it again after the fight was announced. Brook was made after four middleweights passed on fighting Golovkin so it is what it is (a mismatch pointless fight that was made only after he couldn't get Canelo, Saunders, Jacobs and Eubank).

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by ИATAS View Post
                    Not always. Oscar was massive compared to Gatti. I don't remember if it was a CW or not though. And Oscar predictably beat his ass.

                    Golovkin is selling the fight, of course he's not going to say Kell is smaller it's a massive mismatch its a joke of a fight don't watch it, so he's coming off as a hypocrite when you compare it to his remarks about Canelo Khan. And he's received a lot of criticism for it and rightfully so.

                    We already know Golovkin didn't want this fight, he said so months ago and he said it again after the fight was announced. Brook was made after four middleweights passed on fighting Golovkin so it is what it is (a mismatch pointless fight that was made only after he couldn't get Canelo, Saunders, Jacobs and Eubank).
                    If he didn't want the fight he wouldn't have took it.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP