Originally posted by The plunger man
View Post
I used to see Mayweather fans justify why Pacquiao should have taken $40M flat. His resulting pay is why your argument is ridiculous. Sure, Mayweather could have screwed him and earned his $32M guarantees into retirement, but then he doesn't make $225M on the big one, so it makes sense to give Pacquiao $100M. Like Pacquiao, Wilder shouldn't get the lion's share, but as a required piece of a large event, he should be paid what he's worth, and that includes a percentage of profit. Again, Joseph Parker got 33%, and he's offering Wilder 0%. Your wannabe retorts will never conceal that.
I'm a boxing fan first and foremost, and I see one side of this negotiation making boxing not happen. You clowns can play your partisan BS, but leave me out. Whether Wilder wins or loses doesn't matter as long as I get a fight between 2 guys that should be fighting.
Comment