The quality of the historicity is very important. You'd be hard pressed to find legitimate historians say there's reliable historical evidence pointing to the existence of Zeus based on historical sources and those eyewitnesses.
There's eyewitness accounts that he created the world in the odessy and other historical manuscripts as well as physical evidence such as statues and paintings.
I bet you believe your hömosexuality and pedophilia is something you were born with, but it's not.
You leftist pansies have made it ok to be gay, just give it some time and your pedophilia will also be accepted.
You think satellites, mission to moon, etc.. is not based on scientists theories about the cosmos?
Theory of relativity, time dilation, etc..
When scientist have a theory the burden of proof is on them prove their theory..
Why is that burden of proof not applicable to those who claim god created everything
You think satellites, mission to moon, etc.. is not based on scientists theories about the cosmos?
Theory of relativity, time dilation, etc..
When scientist have a theory the burden of proof is on them prove their theory..
Why is that burden of proof not applicable to those who claim god created everything
my apologies for not making my reply clearer..
i did not state anything about any burden of proof relies on whom...
what i did say is that no one can prove the existence of the entire cosmos in every detail from the large scale structures down to it's smallest particles backed up by experimental proof...
we might have theories and asserions but we dont have the tech (yet) to prove those right...
the ones we have prroof for cries uncle when applied to planck time...
Comment