Nice alt...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rigondeaux > Lomachenko
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by RetroSpeed05 View PostNot only was Loma bigger but he was much faster and in hand and especially foot speed. Size advantage played one factor but one was so much more athletically gifted. Rigo looked like a statue.
Its not like a little guy was using his skills while the bigger guy walked him down. Rigo couldn't do anything and had to resort to holding and bending below the waist as "defense".
Loma is superior in every way the size advantage makes it just unfair.
One thing i noticed about some clowns who talk bad about Loma notice how they bring up that he gets bruised in some fight or he "struggled" while winning almost every round on the score cards. But Rigo in his supposed prime got dropped left and right by absolute bums and they treated him like a god p4p fighter. Imagine Loma getting dropped in almost every fight what they would say.
Have you ever tried boxing against a bigger opponent before? Are you aware of how much a size advantage matters in a fight? Rigondeaux moved up TWO divisions. And why do you ignore Lomachenko's own words? He didn't consider this a good win.
Comment
-
You take off that Donaire win. Loma eclipses every other win that Rigo has. Their resumes aren’t even comparable. Not even close
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ca$ual Fan View PostYou take off that Donaire win. Loma eclipses every other win that Rigo has. Their resumes aren’t even comparable. Not even close
Comment
-
Loma didn’t bully Rigo with his size in the ring. It was a technical match. Rigo was out-skilled. Not to take anything away from Rigo though. He’s a very excellent fighter but Loma is just a better fighter
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ca$ual Fan View PostLoma didn’t bully Rigo with his size in the ring. It was a technical match. Rigo was out-skilled. Not to take anything away from Rigo though. He’s a very excellent fight but Loma is just a better fighter
1) Why did Lomachenko mention size as the reason why he didn't consider the Rigondeaux win a good win? Do you know better than Lomachenko himself does in this matter?
2) How old was Rigondeaux when they fought?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShawnTaylor View PostYou can't just "take off" the Donaire win. It happened and it's not like Rigondeaux's other wins are bad (and nor is it like Lomachenko's resume is that special).
Comment
Comment