Deontay wilder on fire about "baddest man" legacy; explains why he's "the king"

[DaNeutral.]

he may not beat Wilder OR Fury

I would bet on Fury to win that fight

so..... what does " king of the division " mean..... ?

I dont care what you would do with your money. Joshua is the KING. He is also the BOOGEYMAN. Infact people need to be calling Joshua UNDISPUTED. Wilder just performed one of the biggest ducks in the sports history. He has shown he has no balls or spine. We should not be regarding that fraud as a champion.

And Fury? Fury can get that work if he wants it, they are all good talkers but none of them are rushing towards the divisions massive A side but just making lots of excuses why they havnt.

[aboutfkntime]

I dont care what you would do with your money. Joshua is the KING. He is also the BOOGEYMAN. Infact people need to be calling Joshua UNDISPUTED. Wilder just performed one of the biggest ducks in the sports history. He has shown he has no balls or spine. We should not be regarding that fraud as a champion.

And Fury? Fury can get that work if he wants it, they are all good talkers but none of them are rushing towards the divisions massive A side but just making lots of excuses why they havnt.

Fury is the lineal champ, and he beat Klitschko first

the king of the division did not avoid Wilder, he fought Wilder

[DaNeutral.]

Fury is the lineal champ, and he beat Klitschko first

the king of the division did not avoid Wilder, he fought Wilder

Anthony Joshua holds 4 world titles, 3 if you want to be a turd about it.

Wilder holds 1.

Fury holds NONE.

And im a Fury fan but then im also a realist.

Joshua has easily the most belts, Joshua sells more tickets than ANY OTHER HEAVYWEIGHT, Joshua sells more PPV's than ANY OTHER HEAVYWEIGHT, Joshua makes more money than ANY OTHER HEAVYWEIGHT.

You may feel that Fury beats Joshua, you may feel Wilder beats Joshua. But right now only one can stand aloft and call themselves the king of the division and that is Anthony Joshua. The other 2 can call themselves the King of the division but they cant back that up with what joshua can.

[aboutfkntime]

Anthony Joshua holds 4 world titles, 3 if you want to be a turd about it.

Wilder holds 1.

Fury holds NONE.

And im a Fury fan but then im also a realist.

Joshua has easily the most belts, Joshua sells more tickets than ANY OTHER HEAVYWEIGHT, Joshua sells more PPV's than ANY OTHER HEAVYWEIGHT, Joshua makes more money than ANY OTHER HEAVYWEIGHT.

You may feel that Fury beats Joshua, you may feel Wilder beats Joshua. But right now only one can stand aloft and call themselves the king of the division and that is Anthony Joshua. The other 2 can call themselves the King of the division but they cant back that up with what joshua can.

who fkn cares about that rubbish ?

belts do not make a champion

Fury is the lineal champ, and he has two better wins than Joshua

Fury's resume > Joshua's resume

AND..... Fury did not avoid Wilder, he fought him

2-0 Fury

edit: Joshua will not fight Fury either..... so, 3-0 Fury

[DaNeutral.]

who fkn cares about that rubbish ?

belts do not make a champion

Fury is the lineal champ, and he has two better wins than Joshua

Fury's resume > Joshua's resume

AND..... Fury did not avoid Wilder, he fought him

2-0 Fury

edit: Joshua will not fight Fury either..... so, 3-0 Fury

LOL. Game over man. I cant be bothered to debate with fools. Whats the point when you cant debate from reality, you are saying Anthony Joshua is not a champion. What next? Knock outs dont exist? The earth is flat?

If you cant even accept the fact Joshua is a champion then you can deny anything you want, not matter how factual, meaning any debating becomes a fantasy claim what ever the hell you want thing and im trying to deal in facts.

Fury has 2 better wins than Joshua? Wlad? Wilder? LOL. So much wrong with that one too. I take it you are a casual Boxing fan.

[aboutfkntime]

LOL. Game over man. I cant be bothered to debate with fools. Whats the point when you cant debate from reality, you are saying Anthony Joshua is not a champion. What next? Knock outs dont exist? The earth is flat?

If you cant even accept the fact Joshua is a champion then you can deny anything you want, not matter how factual, meaning any debating becomes a fantasy claim what ever the hell you want thing and im trying to deal in facts.

Fury has 2 better wins than Joshua? Wlad? Wilder? LOL. So much wrong with that one too. I take it you are a casual Boxing fan.

a title does not make a champion son

it doesn't even make sense, you fkn moron

a champion is an athlete who has surpassed ALL rivals..... and yet there are 4 major titles.....

champion
/ˈtʃampɪən/
noun
1.
a person who has surpassed all rivals in a sporting contest or other competition.

if a title makes a champion, then Wilder is a champion..... so how can you have two champions, when neither have surpassed ALL rivals?

they give those things away, there are literally more than 80 world titles in 17 divisions

I objected to you calling Joshua KING, and you know it kid

those guys are title-holders, until one of them proves otherwise..... and of course Fury has to be included in that mix..... he is lineal, and he drew with Wilder.....

why do you casuals need to have everything explained to you ?

have you really never heard the boxing expression..... "a belt does not make a champion"?

[Froch_uppercut]

DEONTAY WILDER ON FIRE ABOUT "BADDEST MAN" LEGACY; EXPLAINS WHY HE'S "THE KING" OVER JOSHUA & FURY

Deontay Broner LMAO.

The gift that keeps on giving - this guy is the king of delusionals.