View Single Post
Old 11-12-2012, 02:45 PM #24
Fighting_Pride Fighting_Pride is offline
Pure Aggression
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,790
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 15
Fighting_Pride has a reputation beyond reputeFighting_Pride has a reputation beyond reputeFighting_Pride has a reputation beyond reputeFighting_Pride has a reputation beyond reputeFighting_Pride has a reputation beyond reputeFighting_Pride has a reputation beyond reputeFighting_Pride has a reputation beyond reputeFighting_Pride has a reputation beyond reputeFighting_Pride has a reputation beyond reputeFighting_Pride has a reputation beyond reputeFighting_Pride has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 1,319,066.67
Bank: 155,471,217,480.82
Total Points: 155,472,536,547.50
great poster, don't let these racist flomos keep you down. war pacman! - Neutral very good poster. dont let those racist flomos get to u - Neutral wicked sig bro - MexicutioneƦ here's to the fuc*ing weekend! - MexicutioneƦ Pacquiao vs Marquez IV! - Check_hooks 
Cultural Diversity - Hunger - Leukemia - Lupus - Melanoma - Racial Tolerance - Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome - Self Injury - MexicutioneƦ 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stokely View Post
Nope. That would give a monopoly to one authorising body. There should be two. That way we still keep the excitement of unification bouts for crowning the undisputed champion.
undisputed sure does sound good, but unifying the belt means the boxer needs to be so active to defend more than two belts, which is good, but it also means vacating the belt and passing it to an unworthy paper champion. point is 1 central body, 1 belt
Fighting_Pride is offline   Reply With Quote