if david haye and hopkins fought both at there comfortable weights who'd win
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
hopkins vs david haye both at there comfortable weights?
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
David Haye's comfortable weight...about 200lbs...Hopkins comfortable weight...about 170lbs.....
David Haye's easily been an Heavyweight...Hopkins was a middleweight...
hmmm...
-
how about some fat **** who weighs 220lbs vs hopkins, weight dont mean ****.. hopkins could still win... hes never been hit cleanly, why would david haye be any different..
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by SpArKeD-CoLd View Posthow about some fat **** who weighs 220lbs vs hopkins, weight dont mean ****.. hopkins could still win... hes never been hit cleanly, why would david haye be any different..
So, why not just add every heavy-weight in history to that list? After all, if Hopkins has never been hit cleanly then how could anyone beat him?
Oh, and it's "..their comfortable...", not "..there comfortable...".Last edited by BennyST; 11-08-2008, 08:57 AM.
Comment
-
Pound for pound Hopkins is better and would win. Haye's a big knockout artist, Hopkins wouldn't get hit cleanly and would frustrate Haye to a decision loss.
In real life Haye would be far too big and strong for Hopkins and would win by knockout. This is because Hopkins is in the ring at 180 lbs and Haye is some 40-50 lbs heavier.
Comment
-
Whilst Hopkins is obviously more skilled the tables would be turned with Haye having the natural weight advantage that B-Hop usually holds on to.
Haye's a big athletic guy with one punch KO power.Unlike Pavlik who's knockouts come through accumilation punching.
IMO Hopkins would Have the upper hand in defensive skill and stamina.Haye has only been the 12 round distance once in his career.
IMO Hopkins UD
Even though this should be in the Fantasy Fight section.
Comment
Comment