View Single Post
Old 08-08-2010, 06:41 PM #4
cupocity303 cupocity303 is offline
N/A
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,633
Quoted: 312 Post(s)
Rep Power: 58
cupocity303 has a reputation beyond reputecupocity303 has a reputation beyond reputecupocity303 has a reputation beyond reputecupocity303 has a reputation beyond reputecupocity303 has a reputation beyond reputecupocity303 has a reputation beyond reputecupocity303 has a reputation beyond reputecupocity303 has a reputation beyond reputecupocity303 has a reputation beyond reputecupocity303 has a reputation beyond reputecupocity303 has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 3,065,177,544,019.86
Bank: 26,631,097,744,973,420.00
Total Points: 26,634,162,922,517,444.00
have a beer - AL YANKAB*TCH Wladimir Klitschko the WBA WBO IBF IBO Ring Champion - Freedom. Happy 5k posts, to one of the more intelligent posters! - *Boss Lady* Happy 5015th post! - Flab One of the best posters out there - Superflo777 
one of boxingscene's best - Freedom. one of the best - sugarsmosley 10,000 post - -jose- Happy holidays and best wishes for 2016 - -Weltschmerz- Merry Christmas and Happy New Year - Freedom. 
Cultural Diversity - Hunger - Leukemia - Lupus - Melanoma - Racial Tolerance - Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome - Self Injury - bearman3000 
Default

In conclusion, the dogmatic atheist’s assertions on the creator issue are invalid as demonstrated in this paper. Every argument presented by dogmatic atheists involving science to disprove a Creator is fallacious; there is no scientific evidence proving or even demonstrating a Creator does not exist, and there is no scientific research into the “God” issue. The shameful misuse of science by dogmatic atheists is due to their failing to make distinctions between science fiction and science (nonfiction). Dogmatic atheism, for all its pretensions to scientific literacy, is in effect composed of people scientifically illiterate, illogical, and addicted to argumentum ad verecundiam (arguments from modesty). These people are not skeptics or freethinkers but modern cynics -- the great naysayers. Deism is the only religion which is science friendly. The naturalistic approach to science should be encouraged because eventually by the process of elimination, it can indirectly provide evidence for a Creator and with time maybe find not only evidence of a Creator, but the Creator itself.

[Link View Has Been Removed. Click Here To Unlock This Content.]
cupocity303 is offline   Reply With Quote