Originally posted by Nonitard
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Having a Republican primary is pointless....
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Nonitard View Postno, not really
if Ron Paul was nominated, he beats Obama easily. He gets Dems and Independents.
Any other candidate would lose against Obama, though Mitt Romney might have the better chance (his good looks attracts women's vote)
Gingrich loses in a landslide. No one wants a fat white sack of **** as a prez
Ron Paul would get hispanics, blacks, independents.
Obama was voted in because it was anybody but a Republican, an outsider who was nothing like Bush.
Paul can't win anything because outside of his fringe following, neither Republicans, Democrats or Independents take him seriously.
He has to many extreme views that push the mainstream away from him
Gingrich will lose in a landslide and the only viable candidate is Romney. This is why the surge of Gingrich is BAD for the republicans, he's only delaying the inevitable.
I believe the republicans missed a big opportunity in finding a polarizing candidate to run vs Obama.
Obama will win again.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cuauhtémoc1502 View PostPaul???LOL
Paul can't win anything because outside of his fringe following, neither Republicans, Democrats or Independents take him seriously.
He has to many extreme views that push the mainstream away from him
Gingrich will lose in a landslide and the only viable candidate is Romney. This is why the surge of Gingrich is BAD for the republicans, he's only delaying the inevitable.
I believe the republicans missed a big opportunity in finding a polarizing candidate to run vs Obama.
Obama will win again.
Obama is at least moderate on foreign policy, unlike most of the primary candidates who seem to want to bomb the **** out of Iran.
I ****ing hate Obama but he is the lesser of the evilsLast edited by Mohammedini; 01-27-2012, 11:35 AM.
Comment
-
Texanballer makes a compelling argument for the voting age to be raised to 21 (except for those who are serving in our Armed Forces.) But in this case, he might be right. Obama has been campaigning for a solid year, despite the fact that he doesn't even have an opponent yet. And he's already raised over 250 million dollars (well on his way to that billion he wants/needs to dupe enough voters,) flying around the country on our dime and attending dozens of multi thousand a plate fundraising dinners (comprised of dastardly 1%ers.) The MSM has been largely ignoring all of his scandals (Solyndra, Fast and Furious, ACORN to name a few) and have been busy spinning the disastrous last three years of hyperunemployment, massive debt and bitter, divisive rhetoric from our Golfer/Campaigner/Vacationer In Chief.Last edited by Jim Jeffries; 01-27-2012, 12:18 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nonitard View Postno, not really
if Ron Paul was nominated, he beats Obama easily. He gets Dems and Independents.
Any other candidate would lose against Obama, though Mitt Romney might have the better chance (his good looks attracts women's vote)
Gingrich loses in a landslide. No one wants a fat white sack of **** as a prez
Ron Paul would get hispanics, blacks, independents.
Obama was voted in because it was anybody but a Republican, an outsider who was nothing like Bush.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View PostTexanballer makes a compelling argument for the voting age to be raised to 21 (except for those who are serving in our Armed Forces.) But in this case, he might be right. Obama has been campaigning for a solid year, despite the fact that he doesn't even have an opponent yet. And he's already raised over 250 million dollars (well on his way to that billion he wants/needs to dupe enough voters,) flying around the country on our dime and attending dozens of multi thousand a plate fundraising dinners (comprised of dastardly 1%ers.) The MSM has been largely ignoring all of his scandals (Solyndra, Fast and Furious, ACORN to name a few) and have been busy spinning the disastrous last three years of hyperunemployment, massive debt and bitter, divisive rhetoric from our Golfer/Campaigner/Vacationer In Chief.
Comment
-
Unfortunately all the good points made in this thread are trumped, Obama will win again because minorities will actually go out and vote for their brotha man, regardless of what his foreign policies are or what he will do with our country. Doubt as many will vote this time again though.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Big BRICKS View PostUnfortunately all the good points made in this thread are trumped, Obama will win again because minorities will actually go out and vote for their brotha man, regardless of what his foreign policies are or what he will do with our country. Doubt as many will vote this time again though.
Obama was elected by white people since they are the vast majority of the U.S.
Independents are key for him and like I said, the republicans failed to present a viable candidate that could win over the independents because they pander to the extreme right during the campaign process and that pushes away the ind voters.
Obama is a centrist, regardless of what people make him out to be and Mitt Romney and Gingrich are much more liberal than they would ever admit.
Comment
-
-
Is it not a sad day when the leader of the free world is Barack Obama,sure he lied about 98 percent of his promises,sure he is just another bought and payed for politician but what the hell give him another 4 years,what the fck has this country came to,we went from Ronald Regan to this in 24 years.I remember a time when we compromised for the better good of our nation,now the dems might as well be headed by Al Haymon and the rep Bob Arum.
Comment
Comment