Originally posted by -Kevin-
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why do some religious people ridicule Sciences beliefs on how the Universe came to be
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by squealpiggy View PostPeople should just accept that sometimes people die of disease and noone knows why.
People should just accept that lighting sometimes strikes and noone knows why.
People should just accept that bad harvests happen and everyone starves from time to time and noone knows why.
For your comforts and conveniences and probably even your life you owe a debt to people who didn't accept these things, to people who set out to find out the answers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by -Kevin- View PostThey say "oh the big bang yeah nothing just blew up and made everything".
But then their beliefs is that God/or a higher being created the Universe him/herself and when you ask them how was God created, they say he/she is so powerful and so great that he/she created itself.
Okay so nothing just created itself and became something?
Doesn't that sound pretty much the same, like isn't it hypocritical to make fun of the big bang theory while your theory is just as "stupid" as what you're making fun of and sounds pretty much the same?
This is an actual question of mine, Kevin, that I have been wanting to ask for a while.
Comment
-
Originally posted by arraamis View PostI read once, that it was concluded my many scholars that the equation
"What came first, the chicken or the egg" has a solution .....
Either the Chicken or the egg had to come into existence all of a sudden.
Which supports the God concept ..... just not the type of God that is represented by many ignorant, unlearned religious zealots, who have taken every allegorical phase in their holy books at face value.
Of course if you're asking the question "What came first, eggs (in general) or chickens (in general)? then the answer is even easier.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spray_resistant View PostI am talking about this one issue, its beyond our reach so lets just forget about it.
All knowledge is beyond our reach if we don't bother reaching for it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by squealpiggy View PostBut neither the chicken nor the egg had to come into existence all of a sudden. In fact the true answer is that at some point there must have been an egg laid by a sort of jungle fowl that contained the embryo of what would become a chicken. Therefore the egg came first. The curious thing about evolution is that this boundary would be entirely arbitrary, the egg and embryo being classified as the same species (and probably subspecies) as its parent.
Of course if you're asking the question "What came first, eggs (in general) or chickens (in general)? then the answer is even easier.
Comment
-
Originally posted by squealpiggy View PostBut neither the chicken nor the egg had to come into existence all of a sudden. In fact the true answer is that at some point there must have been an egg laid by a sort of jungle fowl that contained the embryo of what would become a chicken. Therefore the egg came first. The curious thing about evolution is that this boundary would be entirely arbitrary, the egg and embryo being classified as the same species (and probably subspecies) as its parent.
Of course if you're asking the question "What came first, eggs (in general) or chickens (in general)? then the answer is even easier.
Comment
-
Originally posted by arraamis View PostI read once, that it was concluded my many scholars that the equation
"What came first, the chicken or the egg" has a solution .....
Either the Chicken or the egg had to come into existence all of a sudden.
Which supports the God concept ..... just not the type of God that is represented by many ignorant, unlearned religious zealots, who have taken every allegorical phase in their holy books at face value.
Comment
-
Originally posted by squealpiggy View PostBut neither the chicken nor the egg had to come into existence all of a sudden. In fact the true answer is that at some point there must have been an egg laid by a sort of jungle fowl that contained the embryo of what would become a chicken. Therefore the egg came first. The curious thing about evolution is that this boundary would be entirely arbitrary, the egg and embryo being classified as the same species (and probably subspecies) as its parent.
Of course if you're asking the question "What came first, eggs (in general) or chickens (in general)? then the answer is even easier.
Comment
Comment