why? i know many boxing fans have a ton to say about hagler, greb, SRR, and hopkins when it comes to great MW's. but why is carlos monzon almost always looked over? i think he did more then all of them.
is it because of compitition?
because he had very good compitition: emile griffith, nino beuventi, rodrigo valdez, bennie briscoe.
is it because he didnt accomplish enough?
MW champ for 7 years with 14 defenses. a record of 89-3-8 59 ko's.
he always seemed overshadowed by other greats, especially by hagler, but i dont understand why.
is it because of compitition?
because he had very good compitition: emile griffith, nino beuventi, rodrigo valdez, bennie briscoe.
is it because he didnt accomplish enough?
MW champ for 7 years with 14 defenses. a record of 89-3-8 59 ko's.
he always seemed overshadowed by other greats, especially by hagler, but i dont understand why.
Comment