What color was Jesus?

[Canelo Phresh]

Guy teaches peace and love, his ethnicity is argued over 2000 years later.

[Checheni_Lamara]

Far as I know Jesus (a.s) was medium height , not short not tall but closer to tall. He was broad shouldered , solidly and strong body . He had very beautiful hair , was coming down to his ears , and sharp eyes . White face , some red , as like just out of the sauna . Jesus granpa was handsomeeee

[I Love Jesus!]

Please even if a white person sits in the sun all day they will never be the dark brown like burnt brass, bronze or whatever. Face it Jesus was either semitic or black. The only white people living in the Middle East and Africa back then were probably lepers.

Ham is the father of the black race his 4 sons were Cush (Ethiopia), Mizraim (Egypt), Phut (Libya), and Canaan (middle east)...Todays middle east is not the same as biblical times... Ethiopia itself stretched well into the present day middle east...In biblical times the whole area was a melting pot between Hamitic people(blacks) and Semitic people(arabs)...Jesus was a descendant of these people...Jewish is not a race but a religion...Jesus regardless of admixture by today's terms would be called black...All of the ancient portraits and statues of the Virgin Mary and Jesus have them portrayed as black it was not until later when white Jesus and Mary show up...look for yourself:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_of_Montserrat
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_M...%C4%99stochowa

Jesus genetically was both Semitic and Hamitic...he got his Hamitic DNA from Rahab the Canaanite and also from Jezebel through her daughter Ahaziah whose offspring continued that Hamitic line up until the birth of Jesus...


So basically Jesus was either Semitic/Middle Eastern/Black.

really these are feet of brass

[the_ilest]

Caucasian it is impossible for jesus to have been black.

[I Love Jesus!]

Jesus is a good player but all the hype is because he’s Asian. Black SOG's do what he does every night and don’t get the same praise

Jokes aside.

No one has the slightest physical evidence to support a historical Jesus so id say he was more transparent.

there is widespread scholarly agreement on the existence of Jesus. We know Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist, debated Jewish authorities on the subject of God, gathered followers, and was crucified by Roman prefect Pontius Pilate. the research has been done. all modern scholars consider the baptism of Jesus and his crucifixion to be two historically certain facts Scholarly agreement on the crucifixion of Jesus by Pontius Pilate is widespread, and most scholars consider the crucifixion indisputable.Might want to do a little research before you shoot your mouth off next time.

[I Love Jesus!]

I believe in God but not in Jesus.

Jesus is supposed to represent our link to God and his kingdom, but we don't need a link.. God's kingdom is available to everyone. We don't need to know jesus or read a bible. He speaks to us in everything that's good if we only listen. Life is full of miracles, not even the most avid non believers can deny this. God makes himself seen to those who search for him. Most atheists have a "i need to see it before I believe it" attitude, but some things need to be believed before they can be seen.

God already made the perfect man and his name was Abraham. The whole concept of Jesus creates soany contradictions to the original faith and is the reason so many atheists have a foundation to criticize Christianity which is supposed to be the flagship representative for all people of faith or spirituality, which it absolutely isn't.

Universal truth is not measured in mass appeal.

exactly...

[I Love Jesus!]

What miracles do you speak of?

the fact that you're breathing.....

[A.K.A]

Invisible.

[[ DUBBZZ ]]

[2shameless]