Announcement
New documentary on Michael Jackson's crimes coming out, HBO and channel 4 to air
-
-
FAKE NEWS!!!!
When you read Robson's deposition, it sounds a little bit overboard, how he tries to sneak an abuse story into almost any and every interaction that he had with Jackson for 7 years. #LeavingNeverland
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 12, 2019
You have to understand, why he needed these claims from a legal point of view. Robson sued Jackson's companies (you cannot sue a dead natural person). In order to implicate the companies he needed to make them responsible for his alleged abuse. #LeavingNeverland
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 12, 2019
But this totally contradicts James Safechuck's portrayal of MJ as this extremely cautious, paranoid abuser who would go extreme lengths to avoid being detected, like #LeavingNeverland pic.twitter.com/Ek73v9QXib
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 12, 2019
This, however, resulted in totally contradictory portayal by these men as to how MJ supposedly was as a "molester". #LeavingNeverland
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 12, 2019
Safechuck, on the other hand, portrays him as very, very cautious almost to the point of paranoia. #LeavingNeverland
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 12, 2019
Comment
-
Another addition to how Robson portrays MJ as a totally reckless abuser in contrary to Safechuck's portrayal as an extremely cautious one #LeavingNeverland pic.twitter.com/PYqJhEeso6
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 12, 2019
MJ refused to take Wade on the Dangerous Tour and Joy cut him off for six months because he did not even call Wade from the tour. She also had to be the one who pursued MJ to put Wade in his "Jam" video. #LeavingNeverland pic.twitter.com/nrPTob6dcK
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 12, 2019
Rosbon and Safechuck's portrayal of MJ as a "molester" also differ in that Safechuck describes a many months long "grooming" period, whereas Robson says MJ couldn't wait to molest him right on the first occasion they were alone in a room. No grooming period, nothing.
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 12, 2019
By the time he filed his complaint the story changed to MJ molesting him right away. It even prompted the lawyers for MJ's side to ask him if his memories have "evolved"? That is it to put it euphemistically that his story has changed. pic.twitter.com/0Ln1swxVeV
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 12, 2019
Robson, on the other hand, expressed surprise about MJ drinking alcohol when he desribed their last meeting in 2008 in Las Vegas (when both of them were adults, of course). He said it was new to him even then that MJ wanted alcohol! pic.twitter.com/r8WqSe8zKJ
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
Comment
-
For this reason,MJ's companies are a central part of his story. In his lawsuit he portrayes them as "the most sophisticated public child sexual abuse procurement and facilitation organization[s] the world has known" that knowingly and deliberately “facilitated” his alleged abuse pic.twitter.com/bRhFmkEmSF
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
The Robsons, who are originally from Brisbane, Australia, first met Jackson in 1987 when he was on tour in Australia and Wade, who was 5 year old then, won a dance competition at Target store where the prize was to meet Michael Jackson.Wade alleged in his lawsuit: pic.twitter.com/DaoYeUdSe3
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
Even Wade himself testified that when he was on stage with MJ at the concert he did not spend any time with the star off stage, their only interaction was on the stage. pic.twitter.com/OA6yiydt03
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
Again, this would have been the end of their encounters if for Jackson or his companies. Over the next few years Joy Robson sent Jackson letters and videos about Wade’s progress as a dancer, but they never heard back from the star. pic.twitter.com/kJilI2hqx0
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
But let's see first what Wade alleges in his lawsuit about that meeting 2 years later in 1990. pic.twitter.com/8cIYhYwlc2
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
Comment
-
-
As we have seen above Joy says in her deposition that between 1987-1990, she sent Jackson several letters about Wade and videos of him, hoping to get in touch with the star again, but all of those remained unanswered.
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
It is absolutely disingenuous from Wade to portray this 1990 meeting in his lawsuit as some sort of plot by Staikos and MJ's companies to acquire him as a victim for MJ.
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
So why does he accuse Norma Staikos of being a "madame" and "procurer of child sexual abuse victims for Michael Jackson" when it was her mother who sought contact with MJ, and it was not Staikos who sought contact with them?
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
It is clear that it was Joy Robson who “purposely orchestrated” the meeting, not Staikos, MJJ Productions or MJJ Ventures. That Wade claims otherwise in his lawsuit is a deliberate lie to implicate the MJ companies and Staikos, because that is the way he could sue for money.
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
However, according to Joy Robson’s testimony, the idea for the Robsons’ immigration to the USA came from Wade’s father, Dennis. Joy herself too felt they needed to move to the USA to pursue Wade's career. pic.twitter.com/9ngSnk8Kjr
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
This goes against Wade's narrative that MJ and his companies brought him to the USA "for the explicit purpose of allowing Michael Jackson access to [Robson] for sexual abuse".
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
And as we have already discussed in this thread, when the Robsons moved to the US, MJ did not even spend much time with Wade, Joy rather complained that Wade felt pushed aside.
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
The allegation that MJ's companies were "the most sophisticated public child sexual abuse procurement and facilitation organization(s) the world has known" is also risiculous because if that was the case it should have been a regularity for these companies to employ children...
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
Comment
-
In his desperation to implicate the companies (ie. to be able to sue for money) at one point Wade went as far in his deposition as to blame Staikos and MJ's next personal assistant Evvy Tavasci even more than MJ himself! pic.twitter.com/vgPjgonqra
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
In his deposition Wade makes absurd claims like that Staikos should have called the authorities when the Robsons contacted Jackson in January/February 1990. pic.twitter.com/Hgs1m06Whl
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
That Norma Staikos is made out to be the main "facilitator" of Wade's alleged abuse instead of his mother, is a big red flag regarding what this case really is about. It has all to do with the fact that this is the way Wade could try to sue Jackson's companies for money.
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
Some more lies by Robson: Besides the civil lawsuit against MJ's companies Robson also filed a creditor's claim against MJ's Estate - for monetary compensation of course.
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
In this case it meant that Robson should have filed his creditor’s claim within 60 days of when he knew both of the following: 1. that he was allegedly sexually abused as a child by Michael Jackson, 2. that Michael Jackson had an Estate.
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
The Court dismissed this argument. Its ruling stated that at least by the time of Jackson’s death, Robson was well aware of both that a sexual relationship between an adult and a minor was a crime and also that a victim does not go to jail for such alleged acts. pic.twitter.com/w6UiW2P8XW
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
If this was true it would put Wade within the 60 days requirement, as he filed his creditor's claim on May 1, 2013, within 60 days of obtaining knowledge about the administration of Jackson's Estate.
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
The Court dismissed this argument. Its ruling stated that at least by the time of Jackson’s death, Robson was well aware of both that a sexual relationship between an adult and a minor was a crime and also that a victim does not go to jail for such alleged acts. pic.twitter.com/w6UiW2P8XW
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
If this was true it would put Wade within the 60 days requirement, as he filed his creditor's claim on May 1, 2013, within 60 days of obtaining knowledge about the administration of Jackson's Estate.
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
In 2011 Wade was eager to work on Cirque du Soleil's Michael Jackson Las Vegas show "ONE", and to discuss it, in early 2011 he made a visit to the office of John Branca, one of the executors of the Michael Jackson Estate.
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
Moreover, Wade's longtime lawyer and family friend, Helen Yu, who helped him in shopping around his book in 2012-2013, discussed the Michael Jackson Estate in an interview on her law firm's website in 2009.
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
Wade also tried to twist the requirement and besides claiming that he was not aware of the Estate's administration at all, he also claimed that he was not aware that he could seek a claim.
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
It shows that long before March 4, 2013, at the very least by September 7, 2012, he understood that he had a legal cause of action.
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 13, 2019
Comment
-
According to his mother's deposition, when her mother asked him why he didn't tell "his truth" in 2005, he told her because of shame: pic.twitter.com/GbB7J9sAz4
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 16, 2019
To further highlight his flip-flopping (ie. lying), here is something he wrote on his blog in July 2018. This is in direct contradiction with what he said in his deposition! pic.twitter.com/zbcXaVrb4g
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 16, 2019
So which one is it? I will be curious which version it will be in the documentary. I assume the shame version, because that's more relatable. Saying **** like "I didn't have any perspective on it until 2012 when I suddenly realized I was abused" is a much less relatable.
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 16, 2019
But he must have he realized himself that the shame angle doesn't work well with it, so that's not what he claimed in court. In public, however, "I didn't have any perspective on it until 2012" would be difficult to sell, so in public he is on his shame version.
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 16, 2019
Shame and the fear of being labelled gay is a familiar story in male victims. But as we seen, Wade just uses this story, to explain his turnaround - and he will use a completely condradictory explanation when that is what is required. Doesn't that sound like a cynical liar?
— Justice for The Falsely Accused (@JuliaBerkowitz1) January 16, 2019
Comment
-
Comment