Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

My Top 50 All-Time Greats!!!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • My Top 50 All-Time Greats!!!

    Accomplishment, Overall Ability and Timeliness



    1. Sugar Ray Robinson
    2. Henry Armstrong
    3. Muhammad Ali
    4. Sam Langford
    5. Harry Greb
    6. Joe Louis
    7. Ezzard Charles
    8. Willie Pep
    9. Roberto Duran
    10. Archie Moore

    11. Benny Leonard
    12. Ray Leonard
    13. Pernell Whitaker
    14. Bob Fitzsimmons
    15. Joe Gans
    16. Carlos Monzon
    17. Barney Ross
    18. Jack Johnson
    19. Marvin Hagler
    20. Jimmy Wilde

    21. Mickey Walker
    22. Sandy Saddler
    23. Manny Pacquiao
    24. Julio Cesar Chavez
    25. Alexis Arguello
    26. Rocky Marciano
    27. Gene Tunney
    28. Roy Jones Jr
    29. Barbados Joe Walcott
    30. Bernard Hopkins

    31. Lennox Lewis
    32. Evander Holyfield
    33. Charley Burley
    34. Eder Jofre
    35. Tony Canzoneri
    36. Emile Griffith
    37. Jack Dempsey
    38. Salvador Sanchez
    39. Kid Gavilan
    40. Thomas Hearns

    41. Ike Williams
    42. Larry Holmes
    43. Floyd Mayweather Jr
    44. Stanley Ketchel
    45. Jimmy McLarnin
    46. Tommy Loughran
    47. Michael Spinks
    48. Ruben Olivares
    49. Jose Napoles
    50. Fighting Harada
    Last edited by asero831; 05-29-2009, 07:04 PM.

  • #2
    you have pacquiao at 23, ahead of Ruben Olivares, Thomas Hearns, Jack Dempsey, Lennox Lewis, Roy Jones Jr, and Julio Cesar Chavez.

    i know people love to criticize people's lists, but c'mon man.

    Comment


    • #3
      do you know how hard is it for a flyweight/bantamweight champ to do well past 126...pac didnt only do well, he had success past 126

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by asero831 View Post
        do you know how hard is it for a flyweight/bantamweight champ to do well past 126...pac didnt only do well, he had success past 126
        buddy, let me let you in on something, pac-man isnt a natural flywieght, he wieght that much when he was in his teens.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by portuge puncher View Post
          buddy, let me let you in on something, pac-man isnt a natural flywieght, he wieght that much when he was in his teens.
          yes, he is not a natural flyweight...but he is so great that he manages to win the flyweight title...duran was never a 126 champ nor robinson a 135 champ in their teenage years
          Last edited by asero831; 05-24-2009, 08:52 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by asero831 View Post
            yes, he is not a natural flyweight...but he is so great that he manages to win the flyweight title...duran was never a 126 champ nor robinson a 135 champ in their teenage years
            and

            who did he fight that was so good at that wieght,
            yes he won a title, but he naturally got bigger.


            how about hearns, he won titles from 147-195, and pacs way ahead of him.

            it doesnt matter so much on wieght as it does on who they fought.
            and the flywieght division is USALLYA the most empty, talent wise.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by portuge puncher View Post
              you have pacquiao at 23, ahead of Ruben Olivares, Thomas Hearns, Jack Dempsey, Lennox Lewis, Roy Jones Jr, and Julio Cesar Chavez.

              i know people love to criticize people's lists, but c'mon man.
              heck... THE RING got khaosai galaxy ahead of hearns also man... why not MP?

              doing sum credible list is not a casual thing to do man... its not sumthing like u take bert sugar's or ESPN's as a template then insert/cancel each nominees @ will without careful thought...

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by portuge puncher View Post
                and

                who did he fight that was so good at that wieght,
                yes he won a title, but he naturally got bigger.


                how about hearns, he won titles from 147-195, and pacs way ahead of him.

                it doesnt matter so much on wieght as it does on who they fought.
                and the flywieght division is USALLYA the most empty, talent wise.
                but was hearns ever been a p4p king? he is only a 5 division champ from 147-175

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by portuge puncher View Post
                  and

                  who did he fight that was so good at that wieght,
                  yes he won a title, but he naturally got bigger.


                  how about hearns, he won titles from 147-195, and pacs way ahead of him.

                  it doesnt matter so much on wieght as it does on who they fought.
                  and the flywieght division is USALLYA the most empty, talent wise.
                  he beat sasakul who beat a p4p top 10 yuri of russia

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by asero831 View Post
                    but was hearns ever been a p4p king? he is only a 5 division champ from 147-175
                    he wasnt P4P king because look who was around, SRL, and marvin hagler.
                    now tell me, has pac ever faced a fighter as good as those 2?

                    no, because there currently is none

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP