I have seen a pattern in many close but clear fights and that is that Lederman tends to favor the aggressor even if he is getting countered effectively. This is the fame that Vegas judges have, they like the fighter who presses the action. This is not always the best quality in a fighter because, after all, what good is it to go forward while getting hit cleanly by a good counterpuncher? I guess Lederman has the Vegas mentality being a New York judge.
The reason why I start this thread is because I just finished watching Carlos Quintana vs. Paul Williams and I can't believe Lederman scored 115-113 for Williams. That verges on ridiculous. I think the closest that fight could be scored was 115-113 Quintana. There have been other fights but I am not going to mention all of them.
Anyway, do you agree with his style of scoring on a regular basis?
The reason why I start this thread is because I just finished watching Carlos Quintana vs. Paul Williams and I can't believe Lederman scored 115-113 for Williams. That verges on ridiculous. I think the closest that fight could be scored was 115-113 Quintana. There have been other fights but I am not going to mention all of them.
Anyway, do you agree with his style of scoring on a regular basis?
Comment