Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

OFFICIAL: Donald Trump thread.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by BostonGuy View Post
    I’m voting for Tulsi Gabbard - she’s anti-war, anti-intervention and anti-regime change. Complete lunatic, right?
    Never heard of her, and she's got no chance of winning the nomination.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by denium View Post
      Never heard of her, and she's got no chance of winning the nomination.
      You've never heard of her, yet you are rendering an opinion that "she got no chance in winning?"

      Got it.

      Comment


      • Comment


        • Originally posted by BostonGuy View Post
          You've never heard of her, yet you are rendering an opinion that "she got no chance in winning?"

          Got it.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by BostonGuy View Post
            You've never heard of her, yet you are rendering an opinion that "she got no chance in winning?"

            Got it.
            She’s too young to have a chance.

            Do you realistically expect her to survive the primaries?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by BostonGuy View Post
              You've never heard of her, yet you are rendering an opinion that "she got no chance in winning?"

              Got it.
              It's rigged. That's why they've had to wheel Biden out because the other candidates are so awful.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by BostonGuy View Post
                I’m voting for Tulsi Gabbard - she’s anti-war, anti-intervention and anti-regime change. Complete lunatic, right?
                She was on Joe Rogan recently. I like her. She’s a fellow vet, very well spoken and has a practical, common sense approach to most issues.

                Comment


                • Comment


                  • Originally posted by BostonGuy View Post
                    You've never heard of her, yet you are rendering an opinion that "she got no chance in winning?"

                    Got it.
                    What he said makes sense.

                    The guy is obviously politically knowledgeable, moreso than the average voter, and he hasn't heard of her.

                    No one with that complete lack of name recognition at this point in a campaign has a real chance.

                    Let's be honest here.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Vlad_ View Post
                      That is a great point. And the answer is no. That is why Barr has assigned an investigation into how the whole thing even started.

                      A political attempt to overturn a lawfully elected president.
                      And the swamp rats are already starting to turn on each other.....


                      Obama spymasters point fingers amid Russia probe review: ‘Throwing each other under the bus’

                      The launch of a formal inquiry into the origins of the Russia investigation -- being led by one of the Justice Department’s toughest prosecutors -- has touched off a new round of behind-the-scenes finger-pointing among Obama administration officials who could have some explaining to do about efforts to surveil the Trump campaign.

                      A key dispute that flared this week concerns whether then-FBI Director James Comey or then-CIA Director John Brennan -- or both of them -- pushed the unverified Steele dossier containing claims about President Trump and his relationship to Russia. The dossier’s more sensational claims were never substantiated by Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team.

                      “Amazing—James Comey says that in 2016, John Brennan insisted on including the dossier in their IC assessment. But Brennan says: no no, COMEY wanted to use the dossier,” North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows, a Republican who has long demanded answers about the origins of the probe, tweeted Thursday in reference to a prior Fox News report.

                      Meadows added: “They know the truth is coming. And now they're all throwing each other under the bus.”

                      Sources familiar with the records told Fox News that a late-2016 email chain indicated Comey told bureau subordinates that Brennan insisted the dossier be included in the intelligence community assessment on Russian interference, known as the ICA. That email chain has not been made public.

                      But in a statement to Fox News, a former CIA official put the blame squarely on Comey.

                      "Former Director Brennan, along with former [Director of National Intelligence] James Clapper, are the ones who opposed James Comey’s recommendation that the Steele Dossier be included in the intelligence report," the official said.

                      Clapper previously testified that the dossier was not ultimately used in the ICA. News that Comey had briefed Trump personally on the dossier before the inauguration -- purportedly to warn him of potential blackmail threats -- leaked within days and opened the door for media outlets to publicize the dossier's lurid claims.

                      Fox News has reached out to Comey's legal team twice, and provided the statement from the former CIA official, but did not receive a reply on the record. Comey, who often posts on Twitter, has not commented publicly on the story.


                      Source, full story:
                      https://www.foxnews.com/politics/oba...-under-the-bus


                      When an admitted leaker like Comey suddenly claims up, it ain't looking good.

                      The D superfans may have actually been right, high ranking politicians may be going to prison.

                      It just wont be the people they were expecting.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP