belt or no belt,if haye loses this he will automatically be ranked below both klitschkos ,and become even more of a paper champ that he already is.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Whaaa? Haye refuses to put the WBA belt on the line?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Leohappy View Postbelt or no belt,if haye loses this he will automatically be ranked below both klitschkos ,and become even more of a paper champ that he already is.
Comment
-
David Haye=
Wasn't too long ago he was going on about all he needed was a ref who could count to 10, now he's taking his belt and going home? The WBA just doesn't want the Klits holding their belt hostage like the others
Stop being a b*tch, put your chips on the table and get it on
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joe2608 View PostI don't really understand this referee rubbish. For me, it doesn't really change anything. Haye isn't winning a decision he has to knock him out so the referee isn't a huge issue. Neither do i care if it's for any titles.
Comment
-
i don't think haye is a boxer that's easy to hold. he will most likely keep the distance ,so this argument doesn't hold much water. but .. it would be extremely unfair to wlad if he had to put his belts at stake, while haye just comes in for the paycheck.
Comment
-
mind games by haye but he is spot on
a neutral ref must be appointed, not a klit loving ref who will allow wlad to cheat as always
Comment
Comment