Spence has more belts, better opponents, and better PPV #'s

[ShoulderRoll]

Than Terence "Bud" Crawford.

Why on earth would he accept a 50/50 split?

[GhostofDempsey]

None of the PBC fans were saying this about AJ when he held more belts, earned 10x more than Wilder, and fought better opposition. He also packed stadiums with nearly 10x as many fans. Had over thirty product endorsements too. You all thought Wilder deserved 50% or even 40%.

[Eff Pandas]

I agree.

That said I get Bud trying to get more. Thats how it works. People get too into this sh^t when its all a negotiation publicly that we see & privately that we don't see & the goal is to get as good of an offer as you can get &/or give as lil as you got to.

[ShoulderRoll]

None of the PBC fans were saying this about AJ when he held more belts, earned 10x more than Wilder, and fought better opposition. He also packed stadiums with nearly 10x as many fans. Had over thirty product endorsements too. You all thought Wilder deserved 50% or even 40%.

The difference is Wilder was a significantly better draw than Joshua in the US.

That margin has gotten even wider now. Deontay's American PPV numbers destroy AJ's. Since AJ's don't exist.

[aboutfkntime]

Than Terence "Bud" Crawford.

Why on earth would he accept a 50/50 split?

that wankery... is fine

but Crawford is the best welter

if Errol "precious" Spence is not happy about that... then he knows what to do

that fight should obviously be 50/50... because...

FACT: Spence is not a superstar... or even close... so he should attempt to become one with Crawford

SAME with Crawford

that kinda talk from fighters is fkn lame... even more so from fans

they could simply fight for 50/50... 1) no harm done... 2) problem solved




























this post may not be popular in this thread... but it will be the most accurate

[Roadblock]

Than Terence "Bud" Crawford.

Why on earth would he accept a 50/50 split?

Because 50/50 of a big PPV is way more profitable that 60/40 off no fight.

The highest pay fight for either is each other, they need to look at the big picture.

[icha]

one thing to consider here is, spence can do ppvs without Crawford, Crawford not so much..
to me 60-40 is more than fair...

[BLASTER1]

that wankery... is fine

but Crawford is the best welter

if Errol "precious" Spence is not happy about that... then he knows what to do

that fight should obviously be 50/50... because...

FACT: Spence is not a superstar... or even close... so he should attempt to become one with Crawford

SAME with Crawford

that kinda talk from fighters is fkn lame... even more so from fans

they could simply fight for 50/50... 1) no harm done... 2) problem solved




























this post may not be popular in this thread... but it will be the most accurate

I agree. 50/50 just effin do it boys. The winner gets 60 percent in the re-match.
This fight would do good numbers.

[Boxing-1013]

that wankery... is fine

but Crawford is the best welter

if Errol "precious" Spence is not happy about that... then he knows what to do

that fight should obviously be 50/50... because...

FACT: Spence is not a superstar... or even close... so he should attempt to become one with Crawford

SAME with Crawford

that kinda talk from fighters is fkn lame... even more so from fans

they could simply fight for 50/50... 1) no harm done... 2) problem solved




























this post may not be popular in this thread... but it will be the most accurate

I agree. 50/50 just effin do it boys. The winner gets 60 percent in the re-match.
This fight would do good numbers.

This...50/50 with upside in some way for the winner. Problem should be solved

[IronDanHamza]

What are their comparable PPV numbers? Can’t find much info online.

That’s the information that matters in this conversation.