Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

OFFICIAL: Donald Trump thread.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by 1bad65 View Post
    And the swamp rats are already starting to turn on each other.....


    Obama spymasters point fingers amid Russia probe review: ‘Throwing each other under the bus’

    The launch of a formal inquiry into the origins of the Russia investigation -- being led by one of the Justice Department’s toughest prosecutors -- has touched off a new round of behind-the-scenes finger-pointing among Obama administration officials who could have some explaining to do about efforts to surveil the Trump campaign.

    A key dispute that flared this week concerns whether then-FBI Director James Comey or then-CIA Director John Brennan -- or both of them -- pushed the unverified Steele dossier containing claims about President Trump and his relationship to Russia. The dossier’s more sensational claims were never substantiated by Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team.

    “Amazing—James Comey says that in 2016, John Brennan insisted on including the dossier in their IC assessment. But Brennan says: no no, COMEY wanted to use the dossier,” North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows, a Republican who has long demanded answers about the origins of the probe, tweeted Thursday in reference to a prior Fox News report.

    Meadows added: “They know the truth is coming. And now they're all throwing each other under the bus.”

    Sources familiar with the records told Fox News that a late-2016 email chain indicated Comey told bureau subordinates that Brennan insisted the dossier be included in the intelligence community assessment on Russian interference, known as the ICA. That email chain has not been made public.

    But in a statement to Fox News, a former CIA official put the blame squarely on Comey.

    "Former Director Brennan, along with former [Director of National Intelligence] James Clapper, are the ones who opposed James Comey’s recommendation that the Steele Dossier be included in the intelligence report," the official said.

    Clapper previously testified that the dossier was not ultimately used in the ICA. News that Comey had briefed Trump personally on the dossier before the inauguration -- purportedly to warn him of potential blackmail threats -- leaked within days and opened the door for media outlets to publicize the dossier's lurid claims.

    Fox News has reached out to Comey's legal team twice, and provided the statement from the former CIA official, but did not receive a reply on the record. Comey, who often posts on Twitter, has not commented publicly on the story.


    Source, full story:
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/oba...-under-the-bus


    When an admitted leaker like Comey suddenly claims up, it ain't looking good.

    The D superfans may have actually been right, high ranking politicians may be going to prison.

    It just wont be the people they were expecting.


    The rats are panicking. It’s every man for himself now.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Vlad_ View Post


      The rats are panicking. It’s every man for himself now.
      I warned em. Its coming and thats why they're trying to go in on Barr now.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by BostonGuy View Post
        I’m voting for Tulsi Gabbard - she’s anti-war, anti-intervention and anti-regime change. Complete lunatic, right?
        The thing is being anti-war/intervention/regime change is not the same as being anti abortion or anti gun or whatever

        The situation changes as the country, regime, region changes.

        You cant just say you're anti war, anti intervention, anti regime change.

        That's idiotic without taking into account different situations.

        Sometimes you need to go to war.

        Sometimes you have to intervene.

        Sometimes you need to change the leaders of an opposing nation.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View Post
          It seems we've been spending pages debating whether or not Trump is "innocent" or "not guilty".

          My question is has the legal threshold been met to even say a crime has been committed? Much less whether or not Trump is guilty...
          That's not what the conversation was about. It was about whether it has been proven that he is innocent.

          As for the question of whether the legal threshold has been met to say a crime has been committed, isn't that why the unredacted report has been requested?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            That's not what the conversation was about. It was about whether it has been proven that he is innocent.

            As for the question of whether the legal threshold has been met to say a crime has been committed, isn't that why the unredacted report has been requested?
            The conversation is about whether or not a man is proven innocent of a crime that it hasn't been proven has been committed.

            So, until we establish that a crime has even been committed, there isn't even a question of guilt or innocence. That's putting the cart ahead of the horse.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View Post
              The conversation is about whether or not a man is proven innocent of a crime that it hasn't been proven has been committed.

              So, until we establish that a crime has even been committed, there isn't even a question of guilt or innocence. That's putting the cart ahead of the horse.
              And that's all fine, and mostly my point.

              We can't say he's innocent (as many Trump fans have done) without knowing all the facts.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                And that's all fine, and mostly my point.

                We can't say he's innocent (as many Trump fans have done) without knowing all the facts.
                Of course we can say he's innocent. We can't even say a crime has been committed

                Comment


                • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                  It's called facts. Something your slimy ass wouldn't know anything about
                  The facts here are: 1) Donald J Trump is the President of the United States. 2)Those idiots tried to fry Trump for 2 years and found NOTHING. 3) You are just butt hurt because you didn't get your way. 4) Our economy is doing great and Trump has the Fed cornered. 5) Long live Trump and the USA.

                  FACT! ..….Rockin'

                  Comment


                  • Nothing dodgy here

                    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncn...mpression=true

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      That's not what the conversation was about. It was about whether it has been proven that he is innocent.

                      As for the question of whether the legal threshold has been met to say a crime has been committed, isn't that why the unredacted report has been requested?
                      Nope, it’s not in the report. It is however the focus of Barr’s investigation, and got the democrats very scared, making those rats turn on each other.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP