is james cameron's avatar...

[talip bin osman]

a live action film with some CGI animation on it or...

animation with some live action elements?

thoughts?

[TensionKiller]

It's an animation of Dancing with wolves without a bodyguard.

[talip bin osman]

It's an animation of Dancing with wolves without a bodyguard.

haha.. with some "last samurai" thrown in...

[TensionKiller]

haha.. with some "last samurai" thrown in...

I was waiting for Forrest Gump to run on a football field, but instead I got a lanky blue thing.

[Jam Jars]

I read that most of it was animation. So i'll go with that.

[Chups]

It live action of Pocahontas without the feathers (or the red dot)

[New England]

movie snob checking in.

i enjoyed avatar. it was entertaining. it's not at all some terrific piece of filmmaking. it's more of a gimmick, but it's a good gimmick. it manages to entertain thoroughly without having much that's substantial.

[talip bin osman]

gents...

do you think "actors" from the future will be reduced being mere voice actors?

CGI IMO, would be so powerful that filmmakers would be able to replicate their nuances and tendencies with greater control than ever before...

thoughts?

[TensionKiller]

gents...

do you think "actors" from the future will be reduced being mere voice actors?

CGI IMO, would be so powerful that filmmakers would be able to replicate their nuances and tendencies with greater control than ever before...

thoughts?

Seen Tom Hardy in Lawless? If you appreciate acting and expressions, movement etc... then CGI just would not have the same effect.

[sigrab]

gents...

do you think "actors" from the future will be reduced being mere voice actors?

CGI IMO, would be so powerful that filmmakers would be able to replicate their nuances and tendencies with greater control than ever before...

thoughts?

I hope not.

My boners are reserved for the real thing.