View Single Post
Old 10-30-2020, 12:37 PM #3
fistic flow fistic flow is offline
Contender
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 469
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Rep Power: 11
fistic flow has a reputation beyond reputefistic flow has a reputation beyond reputefistic flow has a reputation beyond reputefistic flow has a reputation beyond reputefistic flow has a reputation beyond reputefistic flow has a reputation beyond reputefistic flow has a reputation beyond reputefistic flow has a reputation beyond reputefistic flow has a reputation beyond reputefistic flow has a reputation beyond reputefistic flow has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 13,894.10
Bank: 1,792.38
Total Points: 15,686.48
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tokon View Post
The judges for the ritson fight should have been called before the board to explain their scoring. None of them were close, the decision was (another) blatant Hearn funded robbery.
Hearn called the decision a robbery, and the BBBofC pick the judges, so I don't know what you're talking about. It's a problem in general that house fighters of the top promoters get favoured, be that with Warren (Davies/Vazquez), Goldenboy or whoever. The judges should be held to account via the boards or commissions that use them, especially when their inconsistencies are repeated.
fistic flow is offline   Reply With Quote