They have different arguments for the first spot in p4p list
Arguments for GGG
- long reigning champion at 160
- 19 title defenses
Arguments for Crawford
- first undisputed champion since 2005, which is historical accomplishment
- champion in different weight classes
Arguments for Lomachenko
- best win/loss ratio of undefeated opposition - 267/15 (for comparison, Crawford has 514/355 and Golovkin has 747/205)
- the fastest boxer to win a world title in two weight divisions, which is historical accomplishment
- the only p4p boxer who defeated a fighter who was in p4p at the time of the fight. even if that win is flawed but you can say the same about every notable win in Loma/Bud/Golovkin resumes
There's no clear #1 p4p at this moment, but who has better arguments for that?
Arguments for GGG
- long reigning champion at 160
- 19 title defenses
Arguments for Crawford
- first undisputed champion since 2005, which is historical accomplishment
- champion in different weight classes
Arguments for Lomachenko
- best win/loss ratio of undefeated opposition - 267/15 (for comparison, Crawford has 514/355 and Golovkin has 747/205)
- the fastest boxer to win a world title in two weight divisions, which is historical accomplishment
- the only p4p boxer who defeated a fighter who was in p4p at the time of the fight. even if that win is flawed but you can say the same about every notable win in Loma/Bud/Golovkin resumes
There's no clear #1 p4p at this moment, but who has better arguments for that?
Comment