Did ODLH get 50/50 vs. Pac?

[ModernTalking]

don't get mad at me get mad at ur hero duckqiao...he said he's willing to take the smaller purse..what happened?? Lol

70/50.....lol

[thebaklapacklas]

Go back to Pacland and stay there you illiterate *******...Who was Oscar?

The point is. It was okay for Manny to take LESS money vs Oscar (the cash cow at the time) being his name would rocket him to superstardom.

But it's NOT okay for Manny to take less money with the POSSIBILITY of beating Floyd Mayweather to make him a legend?

Manny, Bob and his team know full well they can't manipulate a 'win' over Mayweather and Manny and Oscar just used his name for Manny to be the 'one' who would have a 'megafight' with Floyd. Oscar was DONE at the point Manny fought him and they STILL all agreed to set it up for Manny to win.

What has Manny done to deserve 50/50 vs the current cash cow Mayweather?

Deliver excuse after excuse?

Wait about 3 years now to take a simple request that Mayweather has ALREADY done with other opponents?

Fight May 5th?

Have in house rigged fights?

Fight Marquez THREE times (to 'prove' he 'won') whom Mayweather shut out ONCE?

Ride off Mayweather is 'scared' of me theme to promote his fights OFF MAYWEATHERS name for a few years now?

Have his team constantly make statements for him?

Manny deserves to be told to **** off and let his carnival act fall apart on it's own.

Let him fight Cotto again. So manny can try to look like the 'new and improved' warrior again since so many are all to eager to forget about how ****ty he looked against an even older Mosely with a little bit of movement and even worse getting slapped around by Marquez.

**** MAnny. Boxing as a whole knows the dude is a complete act.

Floyd demolishes him and he'll get no credit. So Floyd should give an EASY work payday 50%? **** that. Give Manny a kick in his ass and his scumbag promoter.

[fragilety]

****ing idiot. Another revisionist who thinks Pacquiao started boxing in 2008. De La Hoya was expected to wipe the floor with Pac, he wasn't exchanging anything. That's why the fight was cancelled at 70-30 and Pac would only accept 65-35. You think if he was gauranteed to become a huge megastar Pac wouldn't have taken the 70-30? Stupid ass hater. Oscar was the one using Pac's P4P best status to for a cheap victory to claim he was once again the best in the sport. You ******* haters were claiming Roach was cashing out on Pac and that's all this fight was to him.

And that fight had nothing to do with Mayweather. I don't understand Floyd's ******ed fans obsession with this. Pac had the biggest fights of 2008 and 2009 when Floyd was retired and people were starting to forget about him. Floyd hadn't fought from the Pacquiao-Marquez II fight to when Pacquiao signed to fight Cotto. No-one was riding off Mayweather's name. How many times did you hear it during De La Hoya-Pacquiao?

It was Mayweather who came back to hijack Pac-Hatton, holding a press conference at the venue only hours before the fight to announce he was fighting Pacquiao's rival. After that fight all the talk was a possible Pac-Mayweather fight. It hasn't stopped since and it was ****ing Mayweather who attached his name to Pac's. And Floyd has not done better numbers as an A-side since he made sure everyone believed Pac was his rival.

As for the 50-50 split, Pac's numbers speak for themselves. He's sold 2 million more PPVs, including double what Floyd has done since he came back, and double what Floyd did last year. Pac's the one breaking PPV records, and outsold Floyd in their most recent fight and most recent common opponent. Anyone claiming Pacquiao doesn't deserve 50-50 is a ****ing Mayweather nut sucker

FINALLY someone here(no offense guys), an actuall real boxing fan that remembers the past, and how things are

[The MiZ]

Floyd pac should be 70 - 30 in floyds favour

[Nonitard]

Oscar lowballed him, Pac wrote a public letter demanding to give him a fairer share.

That's when the Pacman was HUNGRY. cant say the same thing now