Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Of these guys, who is the naturally bigger fighter?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by badboypeenoy View Post
    Rank these guys from biggest to smallest.

    Cotto 5'7" with 67" reach fighting at welter
    Mayweather 5'8" with 72" reach fighting at welter/light welter
    Hatton 5'7"1/2 with 65" reach fighting at light welter
    Pacquiao 5'6"1/2 with 67" fighting at superfeather/feather
    Clottey 5'8" with 70" reach fighting at welter
    Morales 5'8" with 72" reach fighting at superfeather/feather
    Mayweather
    Clottey
    Cotto
    Hatton
    Morales
    Pacquiao

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by MR. NUTHUGGER View Post
      Mayweather
      Clottey
      Cotto
      Hatton
      Morales
      Pacquiao
      Please tell me how Floyd is bigger than Cotto, Clottey or Hatton when all of them weigh more than Floyd on Fight Night.

      Clottey
      Cotto,
      Hatton
      Mayweather
      Pacquiao
      Morales

      Comment


      • #13
        Clottey, Cotto, Mayweather (current physique), Hatton, Pacquiao, Morales.

        Comment


        • #14
          1.Clottey
          2.Pacman
          4.Hatton
          3.Cotto
          4.Morales
          5.Mayweather
          Last edited by IwatchBoxing; 12-27-2008, 08:34 AM.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by IwatchBoxing View Post
            1.Clottey
            2.Pacman
            4.Hatton
            3.Cotto
            4.Morales
            5.Mayweather
            This is the best ranking by far

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Tengoshi View Post
              Clottey, Cotto, Mayweather (current physique), Hatton, Pacquiao, Morales.
              I agree with this.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Tengoshi View Post
                Clottey, Cotto, Mayweather (current physique), Hatton, Pacquiao, Morales.
                So Since Mayweather is closer to Cotto in size, would this be a more competitive match-up than say Mayweather vs. Pacquiao, who according to you is even smaller than Hatton?

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by badboypeenoy View Post
                  Yeah, this is what I get for starting a thread that is as boring as Mayweather.
                  Do all of your posts have something like this in it?

                  Did Mayweather beat up your boyfriend of something?

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by badboypeenoy View Post
                    So Since Mayweather is closer to Cotto in size, would this be a more competitive match-up than say Mayweather vs. Pacquiao, who according to you is even smaller than Hatton?
                    Hatton himself said that Mayweather felt stronger than him at 147. I was thinking as much about physical strength as pure "size". Mayweather can easily slim back down to 140. He is sort of in between all of these guys so physically none of these four hypothetical bouts could be called mismatches in any sense. In terms of competitiveness, I see Pacquiao and Cotto as being about equal, taking everything into consideration. Small edge to Cotto maybe, as he is the larger of the two.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by The Golden Jew View Post
                      Do all of your posts have something like this in it?

                      Did Mayweather beat up your boyfriend of something?
                      Nope, just stating an observation shared by many others that Mayweather is boring. You get irritated everytime I state a fact, are you one of Floyd Sr.'s bastards? I heard he got lots of em.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP