Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Human Evolution is Over According to Leading Geneticist.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Human Evolution is Over According to Leading Geneticist.

    Leading geneticist Steve Jones says human evolution is over
    Evolution
    Julia Belluz

    Human evolution is grinding to a halt because of a shortage of older fathers in the West, according to a leading genetics expert.

    Fathers over the age of 35 are more likely to pass on mutations, according to Professor Steve Jones, of University College London.

    Speaking today at a UCL lecture entitled “Human evolution is over” Professor Jones will argue that there were three components to evolution – natural selection, mutation and random change. “Quite unexpectedly, we have dropped the human mutation rate because of a change in reproductive patterns,” Professor Jones told The Times.

    “Human social change often changes our genetic future,” he said, citing marriage patterns and contraception as examples. Although chemicals and radioactive pollution could alter genetics, one of the most important mutation triggers is advanced age in men.

    This is because cell divisions in males increase with age. “Every time there is a cell division, there is a chance of a mistake, a mutation, an error,” he said. “For a 29-year old father [the mean age of reproduction in the West] there are around 300 divisions between the sperm that made him and the one he passes on – each one with an opportunity to make mistakes.

    “For a 50-year-old father, the figure is well over a thousand. A drop in the number of older fathers will thus have a major effect on the rate of mutation.”

    Professor Jones added: “In the old days, you would find one powerful man having hundreds of children.” He cites the fecund Moulay Ismail of Morocco, who died in the 18th century, and is reputed to have fathered 888 children. To achieve this feat, Ismail is thought to have copulated with an average of about 1.2 women a day over 60 years.

    Another factor is the weakening of natural selection. “In ancient times half our children would have died by the age of 20. Now, in the Western world, 98 per cent of them are surviving to 21.”

    Decreasing randomness is another contributing factor. “Humans are 10,000 times more common than we should be, according to the rules of the animal kingdom, and we have agriculture to thank for that. Without farming, the world population would probably have reached half a million by now – about the size of the population of Glasgow.

    “Small populations which are isolated can evolve at random as genes are accidentally lost. World-wide, all populations are becoming connected and the opportunity for random change is dwindling. History is made in bed, but nowadays the beds are getting closer together. We are mixing into a glo-bal mass, and the future is brown.”
    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle4894696.ece

  • #2
    This is so illogical.

    Comment


    • #3
      Professor Jones added: “In the old days, you would find one powerful man having hundreds of children.” He cites the fecund Moulay Ismail of Morocco, who died in the 18th century, and is reputed to have fathered 888 children. To achieve this feat, Ismail is thought to have copulated with an average of about 1.2 women a day over 60 years.
      Lucky boy!!

      Comment


      • #4
        Seems to me the solution is for us, ahem, "aging" men is to start procreating with young women. If you're married, think your wifey would go for that? "But dear, it's for the betterment of humanity!"

        Then again, who wants mutant children?

        Comment


        • #5

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Cptn. Howdy View Post
            Awesome, he has so many manias and phobias, you can write books on that character.

            He is an awesome villain, simply awesome. Smart, strong, absolutely mad, unhuman and has a very convincing emthod to his madness.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by BrooklynBomber View Post
              Awesome, he has so many manias and phobias, you can write books on that character.

              He is an awesome villain, simply awesome. Smart, strong, absolutely mad, unhuman and has a very convincing emthod to his madness.
              i think this is the first thing we've ever agreed on.
              ever.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Cptn. Howdy View Post
                i think this is the first thing we've ever agreed on.
                ever.
                If I were to be god, I would likely develop into someone like him.

                In fact, he is the god of that realm, and Neo was obviously the messiah.

                Too bad Reeves's character was so flat and cartoonish compared to Smith...or anything for that matter

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by BrooklynBomber View Post
                  If I were to be god, I would likely develop into someone like him.

                  In fact, he is the god of that realm, and Neo was obviously the messiah.

                  Too bad Reeves's character was so flat and cartoonish compared to Smith...or anything for that matter
                  i heard that the reason Reeves has always landed great roles, despite his terrible acting, is that he used to be David Geffen's secret lover.


                  "Bodie this your final wake up call: I am an
                  F
                  B
                  I
                  agent!!"

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Why cant they make a good guy, for once, that would not look cartoonish and flat.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP