Originally posted by ELHURACAN58
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Was Ricardo Lopez the PERFECT Boxer?
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by Fire and Fear View PostBut was he ever really tested?
Personaly speaking I value boxers by there martial arts/technique in boxing then a winning record(wich lopez had)
To me, I dont care for ricardos record but by by thesevalues I care which goes for other boxers:
1.His skills/abilities as well as style and the courage to commit to strong punches by putting himself out there
2. Second would be, the mastery that he has over his body which is stamina,flexibility,power,speed and etc...
3.Practicality, what I mean is that, a boxing style isnt there to hide behind rules and points, basicly its something you can use in a street fight just as well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Box"K"ing View PostEvery time I watch his fights, he doesnt show any weakness or any sloppiness.
His hands are high, his footwork is mobile and yet well-balanced and ready for a counter punch, his left hook is nasty, his straight punches are pin point accurate...
To me he looks perfect but then again I dont have the best standard as to what is the best boxing or not.
But he was never putting punch-perfect combos on ATGs.
He never put hands on say, Barrera and Pacquiao looking just as great.
I give Lopez second place, maybe if his competition was better he could wrestle JMM from first. Otherwise I consider JMM the more proven perfection, if you will.
Comment
-
Comment