Tweet
I have heard that it's confirmed she will be one of the judges in the Juan Diaz - Juan Manuel Marquez rematch and I have to question how this is allowed. Here are some of the reasons why...
1. Gabriel Campillo L12 Beibut Shumenov - She had Shumenov winning 117-111 in a fight that Campillo dominated and was robbed. If you don't believe me then judge it for yourself and you will see that Campillo outworked, outboxed, outclassed and outpunched Shumenov in almost every round. I scored the fight 118-110 and I maybe could have had it 117-111 or 116-112 but there is absolutley no way Shumenov won the fight. She had him winning 9 out of 12 rounds.
Here is a quote from Campillo's manager, Sampson Lewkowicz :
"I demand a full investigation on the judge who scored 117-111 [Patricia Morse Jarman]. It was another travesty for boxing. I want a full investigation on the judge. That judge put a black eye on boxing and a black eye on all of the judges in Nevada and all the people of Nevada. She can never come back to judge again. She is either blind or got paid off - one of the two. Keith Kizer is one the best commissioners and he will never allow that [for her to judge again]."
But she is being allowed to judge again. Unbelievable!
Of course this is the main reason why I believe she shouldnt be allowed to ever judge again but here are some more examples of her bizarre scoring.
2. Oscar De La Hoya vs Fernando Vargas - She had Vargas ahead 97-94 going into the 11th round. Meaning of the 10 rounds she gave SIX to Vargas and just THREE to De La Hoya and one even. I think most people will agree with me that it was a competitive fight but after about Round 5 - De La Hoya just took control prior to his KO over Vargas. Giving SIX of the first 10 rounds to Vargas and only THREE to Oscar is something that has to be questioned.
3. Juan Manuel Marquez vs Marco Antonio Barrera - She had Marquez winning by five points in a fight that I thought was extremely close. I actually had Barrera winning by one point, You can make a case for Marquez winning but I thought 116-111 was unrealistic. So much for "taking the title from the champion", Barrera was given the raw deal in that fight. It could easily have been a majority or split decision.
4. Marco Antonio Barrera vs Naseem Hamed - She had Barrera winning 115-112. I'm British but come on, Your tripping if you think Naz won more than 3 rounds. Barrera whooped his ass and controlled the fight. How can you call that a close fight? I dont understand.
5. Zab Judah vs Rafael Pineda - She had Judah winning 115-112, I like Zab but he lost this fight. He scored a knockdown but after the first 4 rounds Pineda controlled the fight. This isnt a "big" fight, I feel Judah got the decision because he was the big name and had just came off the 1st loss to Spinks. He had to win, I think she had that more in mind that who was actually doing the work in the rounds. If Pineda was a big name in his prime, He would have got the win.
I'm curious to know what people think about this. There have been controversial judges with controversial scorecards before but this women has shown herself to be incapable of scoring a fight before. And I just don't understand how you can allow her to judge again after the Campillo-Shumenov fight which was travesty of a robbery. As bad as anything the sport has ever seen before. It's bad for boxing that people like her arent questioned or just removed from judging for good. Boxing doesnt need big name judges it just needs people who do their job right, And she does not.
1. Gabriel Campillo L12 Beibut Shumenov - She had Shumenov winning 117-111 in a fight that Campillo dominated and was robbed. If you don't believe me then judge it for yourself and you will see that Campillo outworked, outboxed, outclassed and outpunched Shumenov in almost every round. I scored the fight 118-110 and I maybe could have had it 117-111 or 116-112 but there is absolutley no way Shumenov won the fight. She had him winning 9 out of 12 rounds.
Here is a quote from Campillo's manager, Sampson Lewkowicz :
"I demand a full investigation on the judge who scored 117-111 [Patricia Morse Jarman]. It was another travesty for boxing. I want a full investigation on the judge. That judge put a black eye on boxing and a black eye on all of the judges in Nevada and all the people of Nevada. She can never come back to judge again. She is either blind or got paid off - one of the two. Keith Kizer is one the best commissioners and he will never allow that [for her to judge again]."
But she is being allowed to judge again. Unbelievable!
Of course this is the main reason why I believe she shouldnt be allowed to ever judge again but here are some more examples of her bizarre scoring.
2. Oscar De La Hoya vs Fernando Vargas - She had Vargas ahead 97-94 going into the 11th round. Meaning of the 10 rounds she gave SIX to Vargas and just THREE to De La Hoya and one even. I think most people will agree with me that it was a competitive fight but after about Round 5 - De La Hoya just took control prior to his KO over Vargas. Giving SIX of the first 10 rounds to Vargas and only THREE to Oscar is something that has to be questioned.
3. Juan Manuel Marquez vs Marco Antonio Barrera - She had Marquez winning by five points in a fight that I thought was extremely close. I actually had Barrera winning by one point, You can make a case for Marquez winning but I thought 116-111 was unrealistic. So much for "taking the title from the champion", Barrera was given the raw deal in that fight. It could easily have been a majority or split decision.
4. Marco Antonio Barrera vs Naseem Hamed - She had Barrera winning 115-112. I'm British but come on, Your tripping if you think Naz won more than 3 rounds. Barrera whooped his ass and controlled the fight. How can you call that a close fight? I dont understand.
5. Zab Judah vs Rafael Pineda - She had Judah winning 115-112, I like Zab but he lost this fight. He scored a knockdown but after the first 4 rounds Pineda controlled the fight. This isnt a "big" fight, I feel Judah got the decision because he was the big name and had just came off the 1st loss to Spinks. He had to win, I think she had that more in mind that who was actually doing the work in the rounds. If Pineda was a big name in his prime, He would have got the win.
I'm curious to know what people think about this. There have been controversial judges with controversial scorecards before but this women has shown herself to be incapable of scoring a fight before. And I just don't understand how you can allow her to judge again after the Campillo-Shumenov fight which was travesty of a robbery. As bad as anything the sport has ever seen before. It's bad for boxing that people like her arent questioned or just removed from judging for good. Boxing doesnt need big name judges it just needs people who do their job right, And she does not.
Comment