Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Wladamir Klitschko's also got knocked down in his 21st fight
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Weltschmerz View PostWhat's the point with this thread, TS?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Earl Hickey View PostWell, Wlad would have fought for a title sooner if he hadn't lost to ross purrity, obviously that set him back a couple of years.
The point is, age, record etc were all comparable
Wlad was also an olympic gold medallist and had a much longer amateur career.
I really don't see this massive gap in where they were at.
At 21-0 Fury is supposedly close to one, and is being touted as a possible challenger in a couple fights time.
I think there's a wealth of difference between these two at this stage, most due to the state of the division today. Either way, this comparison shouldn't be made
Not to mention, Wlad fought nearly every month back then
Comment
-
Originally posted by techliam View PostAt 21-0 Wlad was nowhere near a title, he wasn't touted as a possible challenger for one at the time either.
At 21-0 Fury is supposedly close to one, and is being touted as a possible challenger in a couple fights time.
I think there's a wealth of difference between these two at this stage, most due to the state of the division today. Either way, this comparison shouldn't be made
Ok, so should we fast forward a few fights, give Wlad a little more time.
So was Ross Purrity better than Steve Cunningham? That was a WBC eliminator if I recall.
What was the excuse in that one?
See the point?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Earl Hickey View PostFurther than David Price
Oh wait... he already has.
I am not a fan of him, if anything I'm more partial to Fury. But to see you writhing around in such agony and anguish, it only pains me. You were a nice guy until you were tainted by fanboy-ism, it looks like we've lost you forever.
Are you going to answer my question about how you see Fury? Or do you fear being laughed at?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Earl Hickey View PostSo in other words, the comparrison isn't favorable to the anti-fury brigade so we should just brush it under the carpet?
To turn it around, you want to brush the fact that this comparison means nothing by labelling those who are against it "anti-Fury" brigade? I thought you wanted an unbiased discussion
Comment
Comment