Defending Pac's Refusal to Test is Futile

[M.I.C.]

The writing is on the wall, experts, commissions, fans, and even fighters themselves have made it clear that Floyd's USADA demand is no joke. Random blood and urine testing is the way of the future and the future is now. Pac picked the wrong battle to fight in this case, one should never, ever, never, oppose better drug testing. It dont matter if you are trying to get a job at WalMart or if your a million dollar champion, U never oppose better drug testing.

There is nothing good that can come from Pac's refusal, it will only harm his image, his reputation, etc...no one can deny that his refusal and terrible excuses that followed are the leading cause of damage to his character. Even today, every time someone from his camp mentions a 17-18 cutoff date, it degrades his character.

Also, realize that in this moral battle he is going up against Floyd Mayweather Jr, the most well known and highest paid American Fighter in the sport. This is the equivalent of Hagler refusing Sugar Ray Leonard's demands (not going to happen) or some other fighter refusing De La Hoya's demands during his time at the top.

Sure Pac has made a name for himself and sure Pac can say that he is big enough to set his own terms in a fight, but dude, you dont play that **** when it comes to Performance Enhancing Drugs. You play the ego and control game with gloves, ring size, purse split and weight penalty bullsh-t...Not Drugs Homie.....I'll say it again......Not Drugs Homie!! Congratulations on becoming a congressman but do improve your decision making in the future.

[ModernTalking]

The writing is on the wall, experts, commissions, fans, and even fighters themselves have made it clear that Floyd's USADA demand is no joke. Random blood and urine testing is the way of the future and the future is now. Pac picked the wrong battle to fight in this case, one should never, ever, never, oppose better drug testing. It dont matter if you are trying to get a job at WalMart or if your a million dollar champion, U never oppose better drug testing.

There is nothing good that can come from Pac's refusal, it will only harm his image, his reputation, etc...no one can deny that his refusal and terrible excuses that followed are the leading cause of damage to his character. Even today, every time someone from his camp mentions a 17-18 cutoff date, it degrades his character.

Also, realize that in this moral battle he is going up against Floyd Mayweather Jr, the most well known and highest paid American Fighter in the sport. This is the equivalent of Hagler refusing Sugar Ray Leonard's demands (not going to happen) or some other fighter refusing De La Hoya's demands during his time at the top.

Sure Pac has made a name for himself and sure Pac can say that he is big enough to set his own terms in a fight, but dude, you dont play that **** when it comes to Performance Enhancing Drugs. You play the ego and control game with gloves, ring size, purse split and weight penalty bullsh-t...Not Drugs Homie.....I'll say it again......Not Drugs Homie!! Congratulations on becoming a congressman but do improve your decision making in the future.

Because Pac is Fighter Of The Decade and Floyd is not...simple as that

[rambov]

If this was any other professional sport, he'd be in trouble.

[PH|L]

That's whats so smart about this stance by Floyd.

On one hand Pac doesn't want his training to be compromised from giving blood which he thinks will weaken him, but on the other if he refuses to comply people will think he is a cheat.

That's why he probably thought that the cut-off date would be the best solution for all parties, but it backfired on him bigtime and now people are even more suspicious.

Damned if you do and damned if you don't.

[M.I.C.]

Because Pac is Fighter Of The Decade and Floyd is not...simple as that

Hey dude "Fighter of the Decade" is that all you got, cause you see idiot, that is an opinion just like P4P. PED's on the other hand is not an opinion, we know it exists in our beloved sport of boxing and your boy will take that test, otherwise the fact will be that he will be considered a dirty stinking cheat.

So you see idiot, your opinion means nothing.

[PH|L]

Hey dude "Fighter of the Decade" is that all you got, cause you see idiot, that is an opinion just like P4P. PED's on the other hand is not an opinion, we know it exists in our beloved sport of boxing and your boy will take that test, otherwise the fact will be that he will be considered a dirty stinking cheat.

So you see idiot, your opinion means nothing.

LOL think about what you're saying man. You could easily say it's a fact that Pacquiao is considered fighter of the decade and an opinion that he is a dirty stinking cheat.

[M.I.C.]

That's whats so smart about this stance by Floyd.

On one hand Pac doesn't want his training to be compromised from giving blood which he thinks will weaken him, but on the other if he refuses to comply people will think he is a cheat.

That's why he probably thought that the cut-off date would be the best solution for all parties, but it backfired on him bigtime and now people are even more suspicious.

Damned if you do and damned if you don't.

No he is not damned if he do.............but best believe he is damned if he dont.

[Seleção No. 13]

This is the same TS that said Pac brought De La Hoya down to a catchweight.

[PH|L]

No he is not damned if he do.............but best believe he is damned if he dont.

Damn if he do cause he believes he won't be at 100% for the biggest fight of his career.

[Boxin']

If this was any other professional sport, he'd be in trouble.

If it was any other sport, Floyd wouldn't be in the posision to play the commisioner.

If it was any other sport, both athletes would have to follow the rules of the commision.

I wonder what Kobe would say if LeBron demanded that he'd take OST or else they wouldn't play against eachother...