If Alvarez beats Austin Trout.....

[-Kev-]

Canelo isn't really a top 3 JMW though. On a ratings list that is very well respected by me, and a few places, he's no.4 and rightly so:

http://www.tbrb.org/rankings/light-middleweight/

The only reason he gets mentioned is because hes a popular mexican fighter. He hasn't beaten anyone top 10 at 154 since Rhodes...... that speaks for itself.

Sadly, I can see the RING belt being put up for Trout-Canelo, when Canelo shouldn't even be top 3.

Adamek #5, Cunningham #10. That's all I had to see.

http://www.tbrb.org/rankings/heavyweight/

They're no better than any other rankings if they too reward robberies when they feel like it.

Like I said:

Pacquiao over Bradley, but...Adamek over Cunningham. Nice.

http://www.tbrb.org/rankings/welterweight/

Bika under Oosthizen and Steiglitz. LOL.

Malignaggi #10, under Zaveck and Ortiz.

Danny Garcia not the champion at 140, despite earning it by upsetting Amir Khan.

Abril despite having been robbed against Rios, does not get the same treatment as Princess Pacquiao. Ranks #5 at 135.

Donaire the champion at 122 for beating Nishioka, but Garcia can not be the champion at 140 for beating Khan? Okay.


Very well respected my ass.

[techliam]

Adamek #5, Cunningham #10. That's all I had to see.

http://www.tbrb.org/rankings/heavyweight/

They're no better than any other rankings if they too reward robberies when they feel like it.

Like I said:

Pacquiao over Bradley, but...Adamek over Cunningham. Nice.

http://www.tbrb.org/rankings/welterweight/

Bika under Oosthizen and Steiglitz. LOL.

Malignaggi #10, under Zaveck and Ortiz.

Danny Garcia not the champion at 140, despite earning it by upsetting Amir Khan.

Abril despite having been robbed against Rios, does not get the same treatment as Princess Pacquiao. Ranks #5 at 135.

Donaire the champion at 122 for beating Nishioka, but Garcia can not be the champion at 140 for beating Khan? Okay.


Very well respected my ass.

Nitpick all you want. This really looks like a desperate attempt at discrediting the whole thing, when in fact the ratings relevant to this topic are the junior middleweights, of which you have nothing to say about.

That's all there is to it.

But if you want to get into it all, I agree with everything on there other than the Adamek-Cunningham thing. When things are generally opinionated, on the whole these rankings are very good.