Been looking into this again lately.
Personally I always found the narrative put on this fight confusing. An old Lewis struggled with a stand-in opponent (originally due to face Kirk Johnson), before getting the stoppage on damage done. Lewis, the long-reigning Lineal champion, won fair and square.
However, if you listen to the commentary, it is clear from the beginning that Jim Lampley et al were showing an "anti-Lennox" bias. I know this is something that was done regularly, but it seemed even more extreme in this fight.
Honestly, in the UK not a lot was known about Vitali, besides he beat Herbie Hide. In America though they seemed to know all about him, like he'd been waiting in the wings for a prime opportunity to upset the applecart. And it seems that is what was meant to happen against Lewis. From the off the commentators are all over Vitali's nuts. Was this a dislike for Lewis? Seems they really wanted Vitali to win. Were they eager to usher in a new era of Heavyweight boxing? Very strange to me.
Read something recently on how a certain promoter would get a fighter a shot at a title, with another of his fighter's as the back-up. You have the champion training for fighter A, then have him pull out at the last minute, with fighter B stepping in 100% primed and ready to go. The champion has trained for fighter A and does not have enough time to make adjustments in readiness for fighter B. This actually works in the stand-in fighters favour... Interesting. Is that what happened with Vitali?
Personally I always found the narrative put on this fight confusing. An old Lewis struggled with a stand-in opponent (originally due to face Kirk Johnson), before getting the stoppage on damage done. Lewis, the long-reigning Lineal champion, won fair and square.
However, if you listen to the commentary, it is clear from the beginning that Jim Lampley et al were showing an "anti-Lennox" bias. I know this is something that was done regularly, but it seemed even more extreme in this fight.
Honestly, in the UK not a lot was known about Vitali, besides he beat Herbie Hide. In America though they seemed to know all about him, like he'd been waiting in the wings for a prime opportunity to upset the applecart. And it seems that is what was meant to happen against Lewis. From the off the commentators are all over Vitali's nuts. Was this a dislike for Lewis? Seems they really wanted Vitali to win. Were they eager to usher in a new era of Heavyweight boxing? Very strange to me.
Read something recently on how a certain promoter would get a fighter a shot at a title, with another of his fighter's as the back-up. You have the champion training for fighter A, then have him pull out at the last minute, with fighter B stepping in 100% primed and ready to go. The champion has trained for fighter A and does not have enough time to make adjustments in readiness for fighter B. This actually works in the stand-in fighters favour... Interesting. Is that what happened with Vitali?
Comment