Originally posted by PensionKiller
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Parker Promoter: Hearn is Greedy, Martin Was Paid Over $5 Million!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by ScottWeiland View PostI wasnt quoting you directly, just the general consensus of the site. I pointed out Parker was given no credit defeating Takam whereas AJ fan boys are quick to call Takam a world class opponent after he fought AJ. Before when he fought JP he was a nobody when he lost and JP couldn't get him out of there, he hung in with AJ for ten rounds and all of a sudden he's a tough mofo, you see what's at play ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by PensionKiller View PostFirstly Takam isn't World class to me. Hanging in there and not winning rounds is commendable, but at the end of the day, you lost every round.He is definitely tough though. To get both eyes cut and still keep coming forward is a sign of a tough man for me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ScottWeiland View PostAs I already said, who's comparing Parker against Klitschko ?
I dare you to contest the four quotes you multi quoted me on, you won't and we all know why.
You claim many times on here of others being to stupid to converse about boxing but its actually you who is usually the dumb one !Last edited by juggernaut666; 11-18-2017, 10:24 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ScottWeiland View PostAt what point have I said he's better offensively ? I pointed out statistically Klitschko has thrown next to nothing and significantly his timing and reflexes were awful vs AJ. Parker at this stage of career in comparison to Klitschko when we saw him in his last two fights, hell even the Jennings fight 2 1/2 years ago has looked abject, all this was to showcase Parker throws punches and for that reason alone has a shot against AJ, a fight I said I still think AJ would win !
If AJ beats Parker I give him more credit than I do for the WK win. This guy you're discussing boxing with cant understand reading any of my posts what is actually being said, completely deflects and refuses blankly to engage on any points I raised bar the ones he wishes to discuss which aren't remotely close to what I've suggested.
You've got your work cut out if you believe you can get through to him.
good points
Comment
Comment