Who Are The Best Boxing Historians?

[Southpaw16BF]

Who in your opinion are the best boxing historians?

[mickey malone]

Who in your opinion are the best boxing historians?

Those who try the hardest to find the truth..

[NChristo]

TheGreatA !!

But really, hard to see who is the best historian because no 2 historians are ever going to agree 100% on a certain list. Fact.

It all really comes down to how each person looks at the different historians e.g Bert Sugar seems to know his stuff stats wise and on different boxers records but not so much when it comes to his lists + he overlooks modern day fighters.

I like Henry Hascup and Jim Amato, always have very knowledgeable stuff to say and aren't usually bias.

[Sugarj]

Gerald Suster is very good on the heavyweights!

[fight_professor]

Bert Sugar is the King.

[tyger]

Nat Fleischer

[fight_professor]

Thomas Hauser is good. Monte Cox is ok.

[louis54]

they are dead

[louis54]

living , mike silver. hes got proper scope for the bulls eye

[mickey malone]

they are dead

Reg Gutteridge and Harry Mullen..

I know he's still with us, but believe it or not, Mike Tyson is an excellent boxing historian..