Is the evolution theory racist?

[Sugar Adam Ali]

I have no doubt that science is racist.. so is math

[krazyn8tive]

We evolved bigger d1cks you mad about that huh?

Which is an fair substitute for brain power apparently lmao

[krazyn8tive]

If we go with how TS framed the argument, then Africa should be light years ahead of everyone else in term of progression since they are literally the first cradle of civilization. I wonder why that isn't doe...

[Szef]

I have no doubt that science is racist.. so is math

[siablo14]

If the evolution theory is real then that would mean that race isnt a social construct.

It would mean that humans in different parts of the world evolved differently. That some ethnic groups have for example a higher IQ than others.

So why do so many atheist lefties who believe in evolution also believe that race is just a social construct?

Because take a baby a from a different region and raise it in another region and watch that baby grow to be just like the others who are raised in a similar region.

[2Fast]

If we go with how TS framed the argument, then Africa should be light years ahead of everyone else in term of progression since they are literally the first cradle of civilization. I wonder why that isn't doe...

they didnt because life in Sub saharan was easier than in Europe.

In Africa you have food al year arround. So the people didnt need to have a high IQ to survive.

In Europe you needed a high IQ to survive the winters, thats why only the high IQ people were able to survive. Thus the average IQ of Europeans is much higher than that of Africans

[2Fast]

The term 'race' itself is a word ergo it is a social contruct. And racism - the belief that certain populations have traits which make them intrinsically superior to others is unambiguously and undeniably so - after all, who gets to decide which traits are 'superior'? Quite clearly only people and societies can make such claims - ergo, once again - a human (ie social) construct. And evolution? Nah. It doesn't give a fuck... if you produce viable offspring then you are, in the short term at least successful, if you don't? Well... off to the trashbin with your particular individual genetic legacy. Evolution ain't putting a value judgement on it. That's an entirely human affair.

Human populations - indeed just about anything can be divided just about any way you like - if you're going to say people with different skin pigmentation are a different 'race' why not say that those with different sized noses or bigger feet are a different race? Such phenoytypic differences are in fact insignificant weighed against the ability of all members of the species to procreate together and produce viable offspring. As elucidated rather well by Bro-Bob above there is in effect zero scientific evidence to suggest that there is any major differences at a genetic level to distinguish people of one colour from those of another.

well the group that is able to enslave another group could be called the more superior race

[2Fast]

Because take a baby a from a different region and raise it in another region and watch that baby grow to be just like the others who are raised in a similar region.

Thats not true. African children who are adopted why white parents still perform worse at school, at IQ tests and so on than white children

[siablo14]

Thats not true. African children who are adopted why white parents still perform worse at school, at IQ tests and so on than white children

Link please........

[2Fast]

Link please........

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnes...Adoption_Study


Harvard psychologists took a look at how black children adopted by well off upper-middle class white families at a very young age perform on IQ tests once they grow up in white families with good socioeconomic conditions. Black children adopted by white parents average 89 on IQ tests at age 17 (slightly better than the 85 average for blacks nationally). White children who grew up in the same households and had white biological parents on average scored 109. Even with the same socioeconomic upbringing, the racial IQ gap remains.
The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study examined the IQ test scores of 130 black or interracial children adopted by advantaged white families. The aim of the study was to determine the contribution of environmental and genetic factors to the poor performance of black children on IQ tests as compared to white children. The studies' general findings were that the IQs of children of a particular race did not differ significantly depending on whether they were raised by their biological parents or by adoptive parents of a different race. The gap between black and white IQ scores remained even if growing up in the same family.