Originally Posted by UglyPug
really dont have a problem with Broner @ #12. . . I really don't - Broner is 12-16ish IMO. He's a two-weight champion now, and wins over DeMarco, and Escobedo are solid wins. Not to mention the manner in which he's handled these guys, and his raw skills, and attributes. . .
But Froch @ #15?! He's 8-10. . .
Froch is definitely above Broner by 3-5 spots.
That's more my issue. That Froch is lower than him, not that Broner is that high. I'd have at around 15 or so. No way in hell he deserves to be in front of Froch.