View Single Post
Old 09-23-2012, 04:42 AM #4
Jamesv3 Jamesv3 is offline
Join Date: May 2012
Location: London uk
Posts: 309
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 6
Jamesv3 has a spectacular aura aboutJamesv3 has a spectacular aura about
Points: 10,040,491.88
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 10,040,491.88

Originally Posted by Ryan RFC View Post
The fighters contained in the list look fine. I'd just have Groves higher than ninth and Khan a bit lower than fourth.

1. Froch
2. Burns
3. Haye
4. Brook
5. Groves
6. Cleverly
7. Macklin
8. Khan
9. Frampton
10. Bellew
I know it's everyone's own opinion but how can u have khan so low , are u telling me that maklin,cleverly and groves have beaten better opposition than khan ? Maklin has been ko'd severall times and doesn't have any world class wins , cleverly has been matched easily and struggled against an average tony bellew and groves has a worse defence than khan and has not boxed at world level . Even brook shouldn't be higher than khan he struggled like **** with jones who is nothing special .

I'd have
1 Foch
2 haye
3 khan
4 burns
5 brook
6 cleverly
7 Magee
8 frampton
9 Rees
10 groves/degale

Feel free to rip my list but that's my opinion
Jamesv3 is offline   Reply With Quote