View Single Post
Old 08-11-2012, 02:55 PM #17
Bushbaby Bushbaby is offline
Wild Apache
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tacoma by way of St Croix.
Posts: 23,887
Quoted: 415 Post(s)
Rep Power: 63
Bushbaby has disabled reputation
Points: 1,255,321,831,987.70
Bank: 3,894,130,807,525,005.00
Total Points: 3,895,386,129,356,992.00
A fellow Williams fan! - Monkz cheers - LarryX2011 one of the best posters - MANIAC310 great fukkin poster - chiguy91 Happy new years - MANIAC310 
For a standup guy! - CubanGuyNYC Bradley's taking this thing down - mathed Happy Christmas amigo - chav Great poster. - CounterPunching Great Tribute to Miguel Cotto!  Thank you for taking the time! - Da Boxer 
Breast Cancer - Birth Parents - F-22 Raptor Cultural Diversity - Hunger - Leukemia - Lupus - Melanoma - Racial Tolerance - Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome - Self Injury - mathed Troop and Military Support - Amber Alert - Bladder Cancer - Endometriosis - Equality - Liver Cancer - Liver Disease - Missing Children - POW/MIA - Spina Bifida - Suicide - LoadedWraps 

Originally Posted by THE ИATAS View Post
I'm just trying to rationalize their logic behind the ratings. Maybe cuz floyd hasn't fought a WW in a long while he's #2, and pac is there by default I guess. All I know is it should be Floyd, then Pac. No one else deserves to be in the top 2, despite pac having two suspect performances in a row (imo he beat bradley clean & clear, nothing suspect about it, JMM different story though).
I think he beat Bradley too. But the fight was still controversial regardless. But if they are going to apply that logic to Bradley, why won't they apply it to Marquez?? I still don't see how Paulie & Brook can be ranked over Bradley either.
Bushbaby is offline   Reply With Quote