That's the real question, the question that really matters. Polls don't answer such a question.
I get heat for my open dislike for the Klitschkos and because I have been exposing a lot of people illogical and biased (Klitschko nuthuggers particularly and BattlingNelson among others). Those people get butthurt, then they side with other people who dislike you for the same reasons (hilarious). Anway.
So basically, I am a bad poster for exposing people. People don't like that. So I am a bad poster. For breaking down their illogical claims. Posting as much useful stuff as I can. That's what makes me a bad poster, a troll, it appears.
But why is Tunney a good poster ? How does he really contribute to the forums ?
Beyond my dislike for him, looking at it objectively, I just don't see how. He never has any insightful opinion about boxing related topics. When he does get in a boxing discussion, he will say something like ''Ibeabuchi was similar to Peter''. Wow. He is much more interested in racial discussions than he is interested in boxing.
All the threads he starts are about posters and upcoming fights. Polls. Who will win ? Who is the better poster ? His knowledge is limited to which boxing events are coming up. Aside from the fact that he provides links for users, no, this guy cannot possibly be considered a good poster in my book.
So please, enlighten me, how is this guy is a good poster ?
Only logical arguments please.
I get heat for my open dislike for the Klitschkos and because I have been exposing a lot of people illogical and biased (Klitschko nuthuggers particularly and BattlingNelson among others). Those people get butthurt, then they side with other people who dislike you for the same reasons (hilarious). Anway.
So basically, I am a bad poster for exposing people. People don't like that. So I am a bad poster. For breaking down their illogical claims. Posting as much useful stuff as I can. That's what makes me a bad poster, a troll, it appears.
But why is Tunney a good poster ? How does he really contribute to the forums ?
Beyond my dislike for him, looking at it objectively, I just don't see how. He never has any insightful opinion about boxing related topics. When he does get in a boxing discussion, he will say something like ''Ibeabuchi was similar to Peter''. Wow. He is much more interested in racial discussions than he is interested in boxing.
All the threads he starts are about posters and upcoming fights. Polls. Who will win ? Who is the better poster ? His knowledge is limited to which boxing events are coming up. Aside from the fact that he provides links for users, no, this guy cannot possibly be considered a good poster in my book.
So please, enlighten me, how is this guy is a good poster ?
Only logical arguments please.
Comment