Boxrec World All - Time Rankings

[IwatchBoxing]

Heavyweight - 1.Muhammad Ali, 1960 - 1981 56-5-0 (USA)
Cruiserweight - 1.Carlos DeLeon 1974 - 1995 52-8-1 (PR)
Light Heavyweight - 1.Archie Moore 1935 - 1963 186-24-11 (USA)
Super Middleweight - 1.Steve Collins 1986 - 1997 36-3-0
Middleweight - 1.Marvin Hagler 1973 - 1987 62-3-2 (USA)
Light Middleweight - 1.Thomas Hearns,1977 - 2000 59-5-1 (USA)
Welterweight - 1.Felix Trinidad 1990 - 2005 42-2-0 (PR)
Light Welterweight- 1.Wilfred Benitez 1973 - 1990 53-8-1 (PR)
Lightweight- 1.Lou Ambers 1932 - 1941 94-8-7 (USA)
Super Featherweight- 1.Azumah Nelson 1979 - 1998 39-5-2
Featherweight- 1.Vicente Saldivar 1961 - 1973 37-3-0 (MEXI)
Super Bantamweight - 1.Wilfredo Gomez 1974 - 1989 44-3-1 (PR)
Bantamweight- 1.Fighting Harada 1960 - 1970 55-7-0 (JAPAN)
Super Flyweight - 1.Sung Kil Moon 1987 - 1993 20-2-0
Flyweight- 1.Sot Chitalada 1983 - 1992 26-4-1
Light Flyweight- 1.Michael Carbajal 1989 - 1999 49-4-0 (USA)
Minimumweight- 1.Ricardo Lopez 1985 - 2001 51-0-1 (MEXI)

[cple]

Boxrec's rankings are always messed up.

[wmute]

Heavyweight - 1.Muhammad Ali, 1960 - 1981 56-5-0 (USA)
Cruiserweight - 1.Carlos DeLeon 1974 - 1995 52-8-1 (PR)
Light Heavyweight - 1.Archie Moore 1935 - 1963 186-24-11 (USA)
Super Middleweight - 1.Steve Collins 1986 - 1997 36-3-0
Middleweight - 1.Marvin Hagler 1973 - 1987 62-3-2 (USA)
Light Middleweight - 1.Thomas Hearns,1977 - 2000 59-5-1 (USA)
Welterweight - 1.Felix Trinidad 1990 - 2005 42-2-0 (PR)
Light Welterweight- 1.Wilfred Benitez 1973 - 1990 53-8-1 (PR)
Lightweight- 1.Lou Ambers 1932 - 1941 94-8-7 (USA)
Super Featherweight- 1.Azumah Nelson 1979 - 1998 39-5-2
Featherweight- 1.Vicente Saldivar 1961 - 1973 37-3-0 (MEXI)
Super Bantamweight - 1.Wilfredo Gomez 1974 - 1989 44-3-1 (PR)
Bantamweight- 1.Fighting Harada 1960 - 1970 55-7-0 (JAPAN)
Super Flyweight - 1.Sung Kil Moon 1987 - 1993 20-2-0
Flyweight- 1.Sot Chitalada 1983 - 1992 26-4-1
Light Flyweight- 1.Michael Carbajal 1989 - 1999 49-4-0 (USA)
Minimumweight- 1.Ricardo Lopez 1985 - 2001 51-0-1 (MEXI)

we can print this and use it as toilet paper

just like with the present boxrec rankings (oh haven't looked at them in a while, cos the last few times i checked they sucked so bad, I think their ranking system is automated, that's why it always sucks, and that's why it make morons happy)

[IwatchBoxing]

we can print this and use it as toilet paper

just like with the present boxrec rankings (oh haven't looked at them in a while, cos the last few times i checked they sucked so bad, I think their ranking system is automated, that's why it always sucks, and that's why it make morons happy)

Wan Wannn, an unbiased computer catulated the Rankings, they have all the right fighters, what is so wrong with the list know it all, P.S your moma is a moron.

[wmute]

Wan Wannn, an unbiased computer catulated the Rankings, they have all the right fighters, what is so wrong with the list know it all, P.S your moma is a moron.

leave my moma alone in the 1st place, and tell you what I ll start a thread on how much sense the rankings make... so we settle this quickly and with little insults involved

unbiased computer... do you know that humans write the programs that run on computers?

also the program runs on boxrec data, which does not tell you everything about a fighter

and those rankings are so crappy that ray robinson is not rated among welters, good god

[wmute]

ok you gave me bad karma... you are a moron as i supposed

[Manny_P]

Tito Trinidad? Whoa!

[cple]

Iwatchboxing...do you honestly trust such ratings? I wouldn't trust a source that ranks Ingemar Johansson and Jimmy Bivins as two of the top 10 heavyweights of all-time. They also rank Buster Douglas at 14. There is clearly a flaw in their system.

[ProBox1]

Buster Douglas should not even be in the top 50. Their system runs on a PHP script which works with points, certain fighters are worth certain points and a fighter's overall point count gives them their standing. Such as Chris Byrd being their number one P4P fighter. The system is biased because the owner gives each fighter a point value that "he" feels they should have. For Douglas to be 14 on the top heavyweights list of all-time means that he must have a high point value on Mike Tyson.

[hellfire508]

These rankings are rubbish. They are compiled using computers, which is why they are so lame. The heavyweight list doesnt include Louis or Holmes in the top 10, and Dempsey and Johnson are outside the 50.